Group identification and contribution guilt predict political consumerism

Abstract Participation in ideologically motivated boycotts and buycotts (i.e., political consumerism) represents an increasingly important form of collective action. However, relatively few studies have investigated this phenomenon, and little is known about its psychological predictors. We tested whether group‐based psychological constructs—group identification and contribution guilt (i.e., guilt arising from the perception of having insufficient contribution to a cause)—predicted political consumerism in the context of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. Study 1, a large two‐wave prospective study ( N = 6014), found that identification with the radical faction of the protest movement and contribution guilt predicted future participation in boycotts and buycotts. Likewise, Study 2, a pre‐registered daily diary study ( N = 110), found that identification with the protest movement and contribution guilt regarding political consumerism significantly predicted actual political consumerism behavior. Together, this research provides ecologically valid evidence that group identification and contribution guilt are important predictors of political consumerism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Psychology
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70147
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Group identification and contribution guilt predict political consumerism

Jack W. Klein, Samson Yuen, Ka Wan Chan, Christian S. Chan
Political Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Group identification and contribution guilt predict political consumerism

Jack W. Klein, Samson Yuen, Ka Wan Chan, Christian S. Chan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Participation in ideologically motivated boycotts and buycotts (i.e., political consumerism) represents an increasingly important form of collective action. However, relatively few studies have investigated this phenomenon, and little is known about its psychological predictors. We tested whether group‐based psychological constructs—group identification and contribution guilt (i.e., guilt arising from the perception of having insufficient contribution to a cause)—predicted political consumerism in the context of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. Study 1, a large two‐wave prospective study ( N = 6014), found that identification with the radical faction of the protest movement and contribution guilt predicted future participation in boycotts and buycotts. Likewise, Study 2, a pre‐registered daily diary study ( N = 110), found that identification with the protest movement and contribution guilt regarding political consumerism significantly predicted actual political consumerism behavior. Together, this research provides ecologically valid evidence that group identification and contribution guilt are important predictors of political consumerism.

Political PsychologyVol. 47(3)
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), International Christian University (JP), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Group identification and contribution guilt predict political consumerism — Jack W. Klein, Samson Yuen, et al. · Political Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS