Assessing fashion brands’ utilisation of synthetic fibre blends and factors affecting adoption of sustainable alternatives

Purpose The awareness of the harmful effects of synthetic fibre has prompted consumer preference for sustainable alternatives. The key factors influencing a brand’s sourcing decisions include cost, product requirements and trends. This study aims to understand the basis for a brand’s fabric sourcing decisions within a specific price segment. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the use of synthetic fibre across price segments. Brands were grouped in five price segments: fast fashion, value, mid-tier, premium and luxury. Virgin synthetic fibre usage and sustainability claims made by brands were analysed using a two-way analysis of variance. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to evaluate the relative importance of eight parameters affecting sourcing. Findings The results reveal significant variations in synthetic fibre usage across segments. Fast-fashion brands demonstrate the greatest reliance on synthetic fibres, differing vastly from premium brands. The brand’s sustainability claim in branding communication was found to have no significant influence on synthetic fibre usage, highlighting a disconnect between branding and sourcing practices. Originality/value The study findings confirm the conflict between affordability and sustainability, offering insights for brands to match fabric choices with evolving consumer expectations. The findings highlight the importance of a strong product strategy to ensure environmental sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal of Textile and Apparel
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-12-2024-0211
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing fashion brands’ utilisation of synthetic fibre blends and factors affecting adoption of sustainable alternatives

Renjini Girija, Somya Singh, Rishika Bagepally Sathish
Research Journal of Textile and Apparel
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Assessing fashion brands’ utilisation of synthetic fibre blends and factors affecting adoption of sustainable alternatives

Renjini Girija, Somya Singh, Rishika Bagepally Sathish
article en

Abstract

Purpose The awareness of the harmful effects of synthetic fibre has prompted consumer preference for sustainable alternatives. The key factors influencing a brand’s sourcing decisions include cost, product requirements and trends. This study aims to understand the basis for a brand’s fabric sourcing decisions within a specific price segment. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the use of synthetic fibre across price segments. Brands were grouped in five price segments: fast fashion, value, mid-tier, premium and luxury. Virgin synthetic fibre usage and sustainability claims made by brands were analysed using a two-way analysis of variance. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to evaluate the relative importance of eight parameters affecting sourcing. Findings The results reveal significant variations in synthetic fibre usage across segments. Fast-fashion brands demonstrate the greatest reliance on synthetic fibres, differing vastly from premium brands. The brand’s sustainability claim in branding communication was found to have no significant influence on synthetic fibre usage, highlighting a disconnect between branding and sourcing practices. Originality/value The study findings confirm the conflict between affordability and sustainability, offering insights for brands to match fabric choices with evolving consumer expectations. The findings highlight the importance of a strong product strategy to ensure environmental sustainability.

Research Journal of Textile and Apparel
National Institute of Fashion Technology (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.