The Party Politics of Defense Spending in Western Europe

Analyses of the politics of defense spending have often assumed a guns–butter tradeoff that maps onto the standard left–right political spectrum, with dovish leftists favoring less military spending and hawkish rightists supporting more. But in Europe, plotting parties’ positions on military spending against their left–right position reveals almost nothing. To address this puzzle, I advance three arguments—first, that nationalism should be understood as a separate axis influencing defense spending preferences; second, that party positioning is conditioned by GDP; and third, that the USSR’s role as an external ideological pole played a key role in structuring left party positions on military spending. I use Manifesto Project data to test these hypotheses and find support for the third. In doing so, I shed light on the sources of party positioning in an under-analyzed issue space, and I offer evidence for the international order’s role in constituting the domestic one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217261429722
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Party Politics of Defense Spending in Western Europe

Eoin L. Power
Political Studies
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

The Party Politics of Defense Spending in Western Europe

Eoin L. Power
article en

Abstract

Analyses of the politics of defense spending have often assumed a guns–butter tradeoff that maps onto the standard left–right political spectrum, with dovish leftists favoring less military spending and hawkish rightists supporting more. But in Europe, plotting parties’ positions on military spending against their left–right position reveals almost nothing. To address this puzzle, I advance three arguments—first, that nationalism should be understood as a separate axis influencing defense spending preferences; second, that party positioning is conditioned by GDP; and third, that the USSR’s role as an external ideological pole played a key role in structuring left party positions on military spending. I use Manifesto Project data to test these hypotheses and find support for the third. In doing so, I shed light on the sources of party positioning in an under-analyzed issue space, and I offer evidence for the international order’s role in constituting the domestic one.

Political Studies
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Party Politics of Defense Spending in Western Europe — Eoin L. Power · Political Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS