Report for the Seventh Machine Learning in Geotechnics Dialogue (7MLIGD) on “Trustworthy data-centric geotechnics”, 16th October 2025, Florence, Italy

This report summarizes the key outcomes of the Seventh Machine Learning in Geotechnics Dialogue (7MLIGD), themed “Trustworthy Data-Centric Geotechnics,” held during the Third Workshop on the Future of Machine Learning in Geotechnics (3FOMLIG) in Florence, Italy. As artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models are increasingly applied to site characterization, risk assessment, and geotechnical design, the dialogue examined how data-centric geotechnics can be developed within a framework of technical reliability, transparency, and regulatory compliance. Three invited contributions addressed complementary dimensions of trustworthiness. One focused on the evolving role of AI in engineering decision-making and its implications for professional responsibility and human-machine collaboration. Another articulated the foundational principles of trustworthy data-centric geotechnics, emphasizing explainability, robustness, fairness, and privacy as prerequisites for effective human-AI teaming. A third examined privacy-preserving methodologies, discussing their mathematical guarantees, accuracy-privacy trade-offs, and compatibility with legal requirements. The subsequent panel discussion extended these themes to practical challenges, including dataset validation, uncertainty quantification, model interpretability, traceability of data provenance, and the readiness of existing design codes to accommodate AI-assisted workflows. Attention was given to the implications of emerging European regulatory and standardization initiatives, notably the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, for defining risk levels, accountability structures, and acceptable performance criteria. The dialogue concluded that trustworthy data-centric geotechnics requires systematic integration of rigorous validation protocols, transparent modelling practices, privacy safeguards, and governance mechanisms to ensure reliability, public safety, and professional accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geodata and AI.
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoai.2026.100090
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Report for the Seventh Machine Learning in Geotechnics Dialogue (7MLIGD) on “Trustworthy data-centric geotechnics”, 16th October 2025, Florence, Italy

Luigi Pinchiaroglio, Patrizia Vitale, Takao Murakami, Kok-Kwang Phoon
Geodata and AI.
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
article

Report for the Seventh Machine Learning in Geotechnics Dialogue (7MLIGD) on “Trustworthy data-centric geotechnics”, 16th October 2025, Florence, Italy

Luigi Pinchiaroglio, Patrizia Vitale, Takao Murakami, Kok-Kwang Phoon
article en

Abstract

This report summarizes the key outcomes of the Seventh Machine Learning in Geotechnics Dialogue (7MLIGD), themed “Trustworthy Data-Centric Geotechnics,” held during the Third Workshop on the Future of Machine Learning in Geotechnics (3FOMLIG) in Florence, Italy. As artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models are increasingly applied to site characterization, risk assessment, and geotechnical design, the dialogue examined how data-centric geotechnics can be developed within a framework of technical reliability, transparency, and regulatory compliance. Three invited contributions addressed complementary dimensions of trustworthiness. One focused on the evolving role of AI in engineering decision-making and its implications for professional responsibility and human-machine collaboration. Another articulated the foundational principles of trustworthy data-centric geotechnics, emphasizing explainability, robustness, fairness, and privacy as prerequisites for effective human-AI teaming. A third examined privacy-preserving methodologies, discussing their mathematical guarantees, accuracy-privacy trade-offs, and compatibility with legal requirements. The subsequent panel discussion extended these themes to practical challenges, including dataset validation, uncertainty quantification, model interpretability, traceability of data provenance, and the readiness of existing design codes to accommodate AI-assisted workflows. Attention was given to the implications of emerging European regulatory and standardization initiatives, notably the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, for defining risk levels, accountability structures, and acceptable performance criteria. The dialogue concluded that trustworthy data-centric geotechnics requires systematic integration of rigorous validation protocols, transparent modelling practices, privacy safeguards, and governance mechanisms to ensure reliability, public safety, and professional accountability.

Geodata and AI.
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO), Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG), Eurix (Italy) (IT), The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.