Reframing growth hacking in resilient startups: the role of generative AI in experimentation, decision-making and learning

Purpose This paper examines whether and how generative AI (GenAI) enables and reshapes growth hacking in startups aiming to be resilient, focusing on its roles in accelerating experimentation, improving decision quality and orchestrating data, measurement and learning. Design/methodology/approach We adopt an exploratory, multiple-case qualitative design. Data comprise 17 semi-structured interviews with founders and growth leaders across nine startups, complemented by secondary sources. The analysis relies on the Gioia methodology to develop first-order concepts, second-order themes and three aggregate dimensions, which are then mapped onto a seven-stage growth pipeline. Findings GenAI functions as (1) an experimentation accelerator lowering the marginal cost of variation and compressing the idea-to-test cycle, enabling parallel selections of controlled tests; (2) a cognitive sparring partner that reduces bounded rationality and groupthink via premortems, counter-arguments and stakeholder role-plays while preserving human judgment; and (3) a data orchestrator that automates cleaning, cohorting, variance checks and knowledge capture, tightening feedback loops and institutionalizing learning. One important finding is that acceleration in the Generate/Take Action phase translates into durable performance only when Analyze/Prioritize is de-biased by individuals and teams, and Measure/Review converts results into reusable knowledge with appropriate inference discipline. Originality/value The study integrates GenAI uses into a coherent, processual view of growth hacking, showing how AI reallocates human attention from asset production to problem framing, inference quality and organizational learning across the seven stages. We build on decision-making theories that stressed the tension between normative rationality and bounded rationality, to suggest GenAI as a tool to overcome the limited cognitive capacities of individuals and address the overwhelming data volumes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Decision
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2025-3305
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing growth hacking in resilient startups: the role of generative AI in experimentation, decision-making and learning

Gabriele Santoro, Aleksandr Ključnikov, Gianluca Centraco, Michael Christofi
Management Decision
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

Reframing growth hacking in resilient startups: the role of generative AI in experimentation, decision-making and learning

Gabriele Santoro, Aleksandr Ključnikov, Gianluca Centraco, Michael Christofi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines whether and how generative AI (GenAI) enables and reshapes growth hacking in startups aiming to be resilient, focusing on its roles in accelerating experimentation, improving decision quality and orchestrating data, measurement and learning. Design/methodology/approach We adopt an exploratory, multiple-case qualitative design. Data comprise 17 semi-structured interviews with founders and growth leaders across nine startups, complemented by secondary sources. The analysis relies on the Gioia methodology to develop first-order concepts, second-order themes and three aggregate dimensions, which are then mapped onto a seven-stage growth pipeline. Findings GenAI functions as (1) an experimentation accelerator lowering the marginal cost of variation and compressing the idea-to-test cycle, enabling parallel selections of controlled tests; (2) a cognitive sparring partner that reduces bounded rationality and groupthink via premortems, counter-arguments and stakeholder role-plays while preserving human judgment; and (3) a data orchestrator that automates cleaning, cohorting, variance checks and knowledge capture, tightening feedback loops and institutionalizing learning. One important finding is that acceleration in the Generate/Take Action phase translates into durable performance only when Analyze/Prioritize is de-biased by individuals and teams, and Measure/Review converts results into reusable knowledge with appropriate inference discipline. Originality/value The study integrates GenAI uses into a coherent, processual view of growth hacking, showing how AI reallocates human attention from asset production to problem framing, inference quality and organizational learning across the seven stages. We build on decision-making theories that stressed the tension between normative rationality and bounded rationality, to suggest GenAI as a tool to overcome the limited cognitive capacities of individuals and address the overwhelming data volumes.

Management Decision
Vilnius University (LT), Pan-European University (SK), Vilnius University of Applied Sciences (LT), Vilnius Business College (LT), Department of Medical Sciences (BY), Mediterranean Institute of Management (CY), University of Turin (IT), EU Business School, Geneva (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.