When AI Gets It Wrong: A Black Female Faculty Member Confronts Bias Within a Higher Education Institution

This case examines Dr. Jacqueline Rivers, a Black woman faculty member at Midfield University, who encountered racially biased, aggressive, and unfriendly outputs from a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool, LexiAI, when she was using it for lesson planning and research. The narrative explores the intersections of race, technology, and higher education leadership, prompting reflections on digital equity, faculty well-being, and institutional responsibility. Amid the 2025 federal rollback of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives under the Trump administration, this case challenges educational leaders to address AI biases that may harm underrepresented faculty and exacerbate existing inequities. The discussion invites considerations of leadership ethics, AI governance, and culturally responsive practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15554589261430684
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When AI Gets It Wrong: A Black Female Faculty Member Confronts Bias Within a Higher Education Institution

Pinyi Wang, Ja’Lia Taylor
Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

When AI Gets It Wrong: A Black Female Faculty Member Confronts Bias Within a Higher Education Institution

Pinyi Wang, Ja’Lia Taylor
article en

Abstract

This case examines Dr. Jacqueline Rivers, a Black woman faculty member at Midfield University, who encountered racially biased, aggressive, and unfriendly outputs from a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool, LexiAI, when she was using it for lesson planning and research. The narrative explores the intersections of race, technology, and higher education leadership, prompting reflections on digital equity, faculty well-being, and institutional responsibility. Amid the 2025 federal rollback of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives under the Trump administration, this case challenges educational leaders to address AI biases that may harm underrepresented faculty and exacerbate existing inequities. The discussion invites considerations of leadership ethics, AI governance, and culturally responsive practices.

Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership
University of Florida (US), National Council of Negro Women (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.