Subjective cognitive change in healthy community-based young and midlife adults: a comparison to those with mild traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research examining subjective cognitive change in healthy young and midlife (Y/ML) adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare subjective cognitive change (both improvement and deterioration; SCC) between healthy Y/ML adults and individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and investigate factors that may be associated with SCC in YML adults. METHOD: The sample comprised 111 healthy Y/ML adults and 72 age-matched individuals with mTBI who completed measures of SCC, psychological status and objective cognitive function. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that 81% of Y/ML adults believed their cognition was no different or better than 4 weeks prior, compared to only 41% of the mTBI group. There was no robust linear association between any measure of cognition or psychological status and SCC in the Y/ML adults (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Many healthy Y/ML adults believe their cognition to be improving over time, at least somewhat (34%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04634-y
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective cognitive change in healthy community-based young and midlife adults: a comparison to those with mild traumatic brain injury

Jacqueline F. I. Anderson
BMC Psychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Subjective cognitive change in healthy community-based young and midlife adults: a comparison to those with mild traumatic brain injury

Jacqueline F. I. Anderson
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research examining subjective cognitive change in healthy young and midlife (Y/ML) adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare subjective cognitive change (both improvement and deterioration; SCC) between healthy Y/ML adults and individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and investigate factors that may be associated with SCC in YML adults. METHOD: The sample comprised 111 healthy Y/ML adults and 72 age-matched individuals with mTBI who completed measures of SCC, psychological status and objective cognitive function. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that 81% of Y/ML adults believed their cognition was no different or better than 4 weeks prior, compared to only 41% of the mTBI group. There was no robust linear association between any measure of cognition or psychological status and SCC in the Y/ML adults (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Many healthy Y/ML adults believe their cognition to be improving over time, at least somewhat (34%).

BMC Psychology
The University of Melbourne (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subjective cognitive change in healthy community-based young and midlife adults: a comparison to those with mild traumatic brain injury — Jacqueline F. I. Anderson · BMC Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS