Implementing digital-supported team-based learning for large undergraduate cohort in a resource-limited setting: a pilot study developed through an international academic partnership

BACKGROUND: Growing student numbers and limited teaching resources, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Sri Lanka, hinder the delivery of interactive, student-centred medical education. Traditional lectures alone do not adequately support clinical reasoning, pointing to the need for active, application-focused methods aligned with technology-shaped learning expectations. Team-based learning (TBL) encourages collaboration and accountability, but can be resource-intensive and is not well-documented in large cohorts in LMIC settings. This study investigates a technology-supported TBL session delivered by a single lecturer, focusing on student perceptions and the mentoring within an international academic partnership. METHOD: After a faculty development programme with the University of Illinois Chicago introduced staff to TBL principles, a single-session pilot TBL intervention was implemented at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, as a descriptive service evaluation at Kirkpatrick Level 1. An existing lecture for third-year medical students was redesigned as a TBL session using the available infrastructure. In line with TBL principles, 252 students were assigned to 20 balanced teams. Eight abnormal uterine bleeding case scenarios and preparatory materials were provided two weeks in advance. During the session, students completed individual and group readiness assurance tests using Pear Deck for real-time interaction. One lecturer facilitated the discussion and completed it within two hours. Student perceptions were collected using a ten-item Likert-scale questionnaire and free-text comments. RESULTS: Among 252 students, 209 participated (82.9%), and 191 of them completed the survey (91.4%). The median Likert-scale score was 4 or higher for engagement, teamwork, and use of the digital platform. Preparation-related items were scored lower. Free-text responses described the session as interactive, engaging, and helpful for maintaining attention and encouraging reflection. DISCUSSION: This pilot study indicates that a technology-supported TBL session is feasible for a large cohort in a resource-limited setting, with strong reported engagement. Students responded positively, despite varying levels of preparation, and the digital platform was a feasible and acceptable tool for teamwork. Limitations included large team sizes, fixed seating, and the inability to use certain standard TBL tools. Further refinement, faculty development, and curricular integration are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09409-y
Primary Topic
Problem and Project Based Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing digital-supported team-based learning for large undergraduate cohort in a resource-limited setting: a pilot study developed through an international academic partnership

Neranja Fonseka, Kosala Marambe, Vasanthi Pinto, Chathura Ratnayake
BMC Medical Education
Problem and Project Based Learning
article

Implementing digital-supported team-based learning for large undergraduate cohort in a resource-limited setting: a pilot study developed through an international academic partnership

Neranja Fonseka, Kosala Marambe, Vasanthi Pinto, Chathura Ratnayake
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growing student numbers and limited teaching resources, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Sri Lanka, hinder the delivery of interactive, student-centred medical education. Traditional lectures alone do not adequately support clinical reasoning, pointing to the need for active, application-focused methods aligned with technology-shaped learning expectations. Team-based learning (TBL) encourages collaboration and accountability, but can be resource-intensive and is not well-documented in large cohorts in LMIC settings. This study investigates a technology-supported TBL session delivered by a single lecturer, focusing on student perceptions and the mentoring within an international academic partnership. METHOD: After a faculty development programme with the University of Illinois Chicago introduced staff to TBL principles, a single-session pilot TBL intervention was implemented at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, as a descriptive service evaluation at Kirkpatrick Level 1. An existing lecture for third-year medical students was redesigned as a TBL session using the available infrastructure. In line with TBL principles, 252 students were assigned to 20 balanced teams. Eight abnormal uterine bleeding case scenarios and preparatory materials were provided two weeks in advance. During the session, students completed individual and group readiness assurance tests using Pear Deck for real-time interaction. One lecturer facilitated the discussion and completed it within two hours. Student perceptions were collected using a ten-item Likert-scale questionnaire and free-text comments. RESULTS: Among 252 students, 209 participated (82.9%), and 191 of them completed the survey (91.4%). The median Likert-scale score was 4 or higher for engagement, teamwork, and use of the digital platform. Preparation-related items were scored lower. Free-text responses described the session as interactive, engaging, and helpful for maintaining attention and encouraging reflection. DISCUSSION: This pilot study indicates that a technology-supported TBL session is feasible for a large cohort in a resource-limited setting, with strong reported engagement. Students responded positively, despite varying levels of preparation, and the digital platform was a feasible and acceptable tool for teamwork. Limitations included large team sizes, fixed seating, and the inability to use certain standard TBL tools. Further refinement, faculty development, and curricular integration are considered.

BMC Medical Education
University of Peradeniya (LK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Problem and Project Based Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.