‘Hitler’s Thucydides’: Percy Ernst Schramm (1894–1970) and the Problem of Nazi Historiography

Abstract The historian Percy Ernst Schramm (1894–1970) distinguished himself in three discrete areas: the political history of the Middle Ages, the commercial history of nineteenth-century Hamburg, and the history of Nazi Germany and the Second World War. In the third of those fields, Schramm was not only an observer but also an active witness and participant: from 1939 to 1945 he was a member of the Nazi Party, and from 1943 he was the official diarist of the Wehrmacht high command. His postwar writings on Hitler attracted considerable controversy and can only be understood in the context of his other scholarly work. Drawing from archival materials as well as published sources, this article offers a comprehensive interpretation of Schramm’s historical thought, finding therein a profitable case study with which to cast light on a contested chapter in the history of German historiography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
German History
Published
2026-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gerhis/ghag013
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Hitler’s Thucydides’: Percy Ernst Schramm (1894–1970) and the Problem of Nazi Historiography

S I Rubinstein
German History
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

‘Hitler’s Thucydides’: Percy Ernst Schramm (1894–1970) and the Problem of Nazi Historiography

S I Rubinstein
article en

Abstract

Abstract The historian Percy Ernst Schramm (1894–1970) distinguished himself in three discrete areas: the political history of the Middle Ages, the commercial history of nineteenth-century Hamburg, and the history of Nazi Germany and the Second World War. In the third of those fields, Schramm was not only an observer but also an active witness and participant: from 1939 to 1945 he was a member of the Nazi Party, and from 1943 he was the official diarist of the Wehrmacht high command. His postwar writings on Hitler attracted considerable controversy and can only be understood in the context of his other scholarly work. Drawing from archival materials as well as published sources, this article offers a comprehensive interpretation of Schramm’s historical thought, finding therein a profitable case study with which to cast light on a contested chapter in the history of German historiography.

German History
University of Oxford (GB), New College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.