Gender discrimination in hiring in older age? Experimental evidence from employer evaluations

Despite extensive research on gender discrimination in hiring, little is known about how gender biases affect job applicants in older age. This study examines whether and how gendered hiring discrimination persists later in life, focusing on variation by the content of the work performed at the workplace, employer gender, and employer role. Drawing on a factorial survey experiment with 5017 Danish employers and 20,068 applicant evaluations, we assess hireability scores and the probability of being selected for applicants aged 45 to 75, representing later-career job applicants. Overall, gender differences in hireability scores are very small: female applicants are rated only slightly lower than males, and this subtle evaluative bias does not translate into lower selection probabilities. However, some context-specific patterns can be found: In production-oriented workplaces, female applicants receive significantly lower ratings and face a corresponding reduction in the likelihood of being selected. Female applicants are also rated somewhat lower by male employers and by workplace owners in production settings. The study does not find contexts in which male applicants are evaluated significantly lower than female applicants. Overall, we conclude that gender disparities in hiring in later career stages are context-specific and therefore largely similar to those documented in studies among younger, reproductive-age applicants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Sociologica
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993261448810
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender discrimination in hiring in older age? Experimental evidence from employer evaluations

Christian Albrekt Larsen, Jeevitha Yogachandiran Qvist
Acta Sociologica
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Gender discrimination in hiring in older age? Experimental evidence from employer evaluations

Christian Albrekt Larsen, Jeevitha Yogachandiran Qvist
article en

Abstract

Despite extensive research on gender discrimination in hiring, little is known about how gender biases affect job applicants in older age. This study examines whether and how gendered hiring discrimination persists later in life, focusing on variation by the content of the work performed at the workplace, employer gender, and employer role. Drawing on a factorial survey experiment with 5017 Danish employers and 20,068 applicant evaluations, we assess hireability scores and the probability of being selected for applicants aged 45 to 75, representing later-career job applicants. Overall, gender differences in hireability scores are very small: female applicants are rated only slightly lower than males, and this subtle evaluative bias does not translate into lower selection probabilities. However, some context-specific patterns can be found: In production-oriented workplaces, female applicants receive significantly lower ratings and face a corresponding reduction in the likelihood of being selected. Female applicants are also rated somewhat lower by male employers and by workplace owners in production settings. The study does not find contexts in which male applicants are evaluated significantly lower than female applicants. Overall, we conclude that gender disparities in hiring in later career stages are context-specific and therefore largely similar to those documented in studies among younger, reproductive-age applicants.

Acta Sociologica
Aalborg University (DK)
TrygFonden
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.