Categorizing adult protective services programs by investigation and quality assurance practices.

Without a dedicated federal funding stream and evidence-based practices, state adult protective services (APS) programs developed with a wide variation in policies and practices based on the influence of adjacent systems, the state culture for human services, and community needs. Using data from a recent national evaluation of APS programs, this study used principal component analysis and cluster analysis to examine whether APS programs can be categorized by the level of their implementation of investigation and quality assurance (QA) policy and practices. To further understand factors that may contribute to program quality and consistency, we compared these clusters on their state characteristics, APS program administrative structures, and system-level outcomes. Recently adopted federal regulations require a greater degree of standardization for APS programs, and as new federal funding is used for program improvement, findings suggest opportunities for APS programs to improve by adopting additional investigatory and QA practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2026.2652869
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Categorizing adult protective services programs by investigation and quality assurance practices.

Juan J. Nunez, Zachary Gassoumis, Erin K. Barker, Gila R. Shusterman et al.
PubMed
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Categorizing adult protective services programs by investigation and quality assurance practices.

Juan J. Nunez, Zachary Gassoumis, Erin K. Barker, Gila R. Shusterman, Karl G Urban
article en

Abstract

Without a dedicated federal funding stream and evidence-based practices, state adult protective services (APS) programs developed with a wide variation in policies and practices based on the influence of adjacent systems, the state culture for human services, and community needs. Using data from a recent national evaluation of APS programs, this study used principal component analysis and cluster analysis to examine whether APS programs can be categorized by the level of their implementation of investigation and quality assurance (QA) policy and practices. To further understand factors that may contribute to program quality and consistency, we compared these clusters on their state characteristics, APS program administrative structures, and system-level outcomes. Recently adopted federal regulations require a greater degree of standardization for APS programs, and as new federal funding is used for program improvement, findings suggest opportunities for APS programs to improve by adopting additional investigatory and QA practices.

PubMed
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Sentimetrix (United States) (US), Institute on Aging (US), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Categorizing adult protective services programs by investigation and quality assurance practices. — Juan J. Nunez, Zachary Gassoumis, et al. · PubMed (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS