Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts to the Loss of Low Earth Orbit Satellite Observations

Abstract Tropical cyclones are among the most destructive natural hazards, impacting millions of people worldwide each year. Accurate and timely forecasts are therefore essential for effective preparedness and risk mitigation. Forecast skill depends on both the performance of numerical weather prediction models and the observations assimilated into the system to provide the initial conditions. In this study, we assess the impact of different observing systems, with particular emphasis on microwave (MW) and infrared (IR) measurements from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, on tropical cyclone forecasts. We evaluated predictions for several historical tropical cyclones using NASA's Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation framework. The results indicate that excluding MW and IR satellite observations from the assimilation process leads to a substantial degradation of track forecasts. The forecasts for maximum wind speed and minimum sea level pressure are comparatively less sensitive to denial of MW and IR observations and the impact overall diminishes at longer lead times. In addition, increasing the model horizontal resolution from approximately 25–12 km leads to notable improvements in the intensity forecasts but some limited impro vements in track predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026jd046562
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts to the Loss of Low Earth Orbit Satellite Observations

Isaac Moradi, Satya Kalluri, Vijay Tallapragada, Yanqiu Zhu
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
article

Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts to the Loss of Low Earth Orbit Satellite Observations

Isaac Moradi, Satya Kalluri, Vijay Tallapragada, Yanqiu Zhu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Tropical cyclones are among the most destructive natural hazards, impacting millions of people worldwide each year. Accurate and timely forecasts are therefore essential for effective preparedness and risk mitigation. Forecast skill depends on both the performance of numerical weather prediction models and the observations assimilated into the system to provide the initial conditions. In this study, we assess the impact of different observing systems, with particular emphasis on microwave (MW) and infrared (IR) measurements from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, on tropical cyclone forecasts. We evaluated predictions for several historical tropical cyclones using NASA's Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation framework. The results indicate that excluding MW and IR satellite observations from the assimilation process leads to a substantial degradation of track forecasts. The forecasts for maximum wind speed and minimum sea level pressure are comparatively less sensitive to denial of MW and IR observations and the impact overall diminishes at longer lead times. In addition, increasing the model horizontal resolution from approximately 25–12 km leads to notable improvements in the intensity forecasts but some limited impro vements in track predictions.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(9)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (US), Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies (United States) (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Science Mission Directorate, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.