The agency-structure antinomy as social form: Towards a historical critique of sociological reason

This article argues that the agency-structure antinomy, far from constituting an ontological feature of social reality or a mere product of conceptual confusion, is a historically specific social form produced by and through capitalist relations of objectification. Through an immanent critique of the post-Parsonian proposals of Pierre Bourdieu and Margaret Archer, it is argued that successive attempts to transcend this antinomy have reproduced it at a new level of abstraction, due to shared neo-Kantian presuppositions. Drawing on Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism as developed by the Neue Marx-Lektüre and WertKritik traditions, the article argues that an adequate sociological account of the antinomy requires understanding it not as the basis of explanation, but as what must itself be theoretically constituted and historically explained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205261447910
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The agency-structure antinomy as social form: Towards a historical critique of sociological reason

Pedro Casanova
Critical Sociology
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

The agency-structure antinomy as social form: Towards a historical critique of sociological reason

Pedro Casanova
article en

Abstract

This article argues that the agency-structure antinomy, far from constituting an ontological feature of social reality or a mere product of conceptual confusion, is a historically specific social form produced by and through capitalist relations of objectification. Through an immanent critique of the post-Parsonian proposals of Pierre Bourdieu and Margaret Archer, it is argued that successive attempts to transcend this antinomy have reproduced it at a new level of abstraction, due to shared neo-Kantian presuppositions. Drawing on Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism as developed by the Neue Marx-Lektüre and WertKritik traditions, the article argues that an adequate sociological account of the antinomy requires understanding it not as the basis of explanation, but as what must itself be theoretically constituted and historically explained.

Critical Sociology
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.