Comparative Visual Performance and Optical Stability of Clareon Vivity and TECNIS PureSee EDoF IOLs in Cataract Patients

Purpose: Cataracts and presbyopia affect millions worldwide, driving demand for advanced intraocular lenses (IOLs) to restore vision and reduce spectacle dependence. Extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOLs, such as Clareon Vivity and TECNIS PureSee, provide continuous vision with minimal disturbances. Given limited direct clinical comparisons, this research offers a head-to-head analysis of their visual performance and optical stability in cataract patients. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 106 eyes from 72 patients who underwent phacoemulsification with Clareon Vivity or TECNIS PureSee IOL implantation. Primary outcome measures were monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate VA (UIVA) at 66/80 cm, uncorrected near VA (UNVA) at 40 cm, and longitudinal internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), specifically total coma. Refractive error (spherical/cylindrical powers [SPH/CYL], spherical equivalent [SE]) and defocus curve (+1.5 D to – 3.5 D under mesopic/photopic conditions) were measured at 1 and 3 months postoperatively; HOAs (spherical aberration [SA], coma) and pupil size were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, and contrast sensitivity (CS; 1.5– 18 cpd) at 1 month using standardized equipment. Results: Both IOLs significantly improved UDVA (p < 0.05). Clareon Vivity showed superior monocular UIVA at 80 cm at 1 and 3 months (p = 0.0042 and p = 0.0711, respectively), comparable UIVA at 66 cm and UNVA at 40 cm, a broader defocus range (+0.5 D to – 2.0 D), and lower total coma at 1 and 3 months (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0097) with reduced variability, emphasizing mid-range vision and optical stability advantages. TECNIS PureSee exhibited comparable refractive outcomes and CS, with initial superiority in monocular UNVA at 40 cm at 1 month (p < 0.05), providing robust early near vision. Conclusion: Clareon Vivity excels in intermediate vision, defocus tolerance, and coma stability, while TECNIS PureSee offers strong initial near focus. These differences suggest Clareon Vivity may be particularly suitable for patients prioritizing mid-range stability, while both IOLs provide excellent overall visual performance. Keywords: EDoF IOLs, cataract surgery, visual performance, coma tolerance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical ophthalmology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s602964
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Visual Performance and Optical Stability of Clareon Vivity and TECNIS PureSee EDoF IOLs in Cataract Patients

D J Kim, Younghee Kim, Jiwon Jeong, Hui June Kim
Clinical ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Comparative Visual Performance and Optical Stability of Clareon Vivity and TECNIS PureSee EDoF IOLs in Cataract Patients

D J Kim, Younghee Kim, Jiwon Jeong, Hui June Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Cataracts and presbyopia affect millions worldwide, driving demand for advanced intraocular lenses (IOLs) to restore vision and reduce spectacle dependence. Extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOLs, such as Clareon Vivity and TECNIS PureSee, provide continuous vision with minimal disturbances. Given limited direct clinical comparisons, this research offers a head-to-head analysis of their visual performance and optical stability in cataract patients. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 106 eyes from 72 patients who underwent phacoemulsification with Clareon Vivity or TECNIS PureSee IOL implantation. Primary outcome measures were monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate VA (UIVA) at 66/80 cm, uncorrected near VA (UNVA) at 40 cm, and longitudinal internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), specifically total coma. Refractive error (spherical/cylindrical powers [SPH/CYL], spherical equivalent [SE]) and defocus curve (+1.5 D to – 3.5 D under mesopic/photopic conditions) were measured at 1 and 3 months postoperatively; HOAs (spherical aberration [SA], coma) and pupil size were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, and contrast sensitivity (CS; 1.5– 18 cpd) at 1 month using standardized equipment. Results: Both IOLs significantly improved UDVA (p < 0.05). Clareon Vivity showed superior monocular UIVA at 80 cm at 1 and 3 months (p = 0.0042 and p = 0.0711, respectively), comparable UIVA at 66 cm and UNVA at 40 cm, a broader defocus range (+0.5 D to – 2.0 D), and lower total coma at 1 and 3 months (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0097) with reduced variability, emphasizing mid-range vision and optical stability advantages. TECNIS PureSee exhibited comparable refractive outcomes and CS, with initial superiority in monocular UNVA at 40 cm at 1 month (p < 0.05), providing robust early near vision. Conclusion: Clareon Vivity excels in intermediate vision, defocus tolerance, and coma stability, while TECNIS PureSee offers strong initial near focus. These differences suggest Clareon Vivity may be particularly suitable for patients prioritizing mid-range stability, while both IOLs provide excellent overall visual performance. Keywords: EDoF IOLs, cataract surgery, visual performance, coma tolerance

Clinical ophthalmologyVol. Volume 20
Gyeongsang National University (KR), Kim's Eye Hospital (KR), Onnuri Smile Eye Clinic (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.