Trait Characteristics, Exposure to Abusive Dating Behaviours and Paranoia in a Sample of British Adults

ABSTRACT This cross‐sectional correlational survey study uses the vulnerability‐stress model to examine interactions between trait characteristics and exposure to abusive dating behaviours (ghosting, breadcrumbing, gaslighting and coercion) and their associations with paranoia. A sample of 544 individuals in the United Kingdom provided socio‐demographic information and then completed measures of ghosting, breadcrumbing, gaslighting, coercion, attachment style, rejection sensitivity, identity resilience self‐esteem and paranoia. Two generalised linear models showed that being single interacted with breadcrumbing to predict higher paranoia; that rejection sensitivity and anxious and close attachment interacted with ghosting to predict higher and lower paranoia, respectively; and that being single and anxious attachment style interacted with gaslighting and coercion to predict higher paranoia. People with certain trait characteristics may be more or less prone to paranoia when exposed to the common abusive behaviours of ghosting, breadcrumbing, gaslighting and coercion from a dating partner. Psychological interventions should focus on developing secure working attachment models and identity resilience self‐esteem to reduce the risk of paranoia in people faced with abusive dating behaviours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MultiPsych
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mps2.70007
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trait Characteristics, Exposure to Abusive Dating Behaviours and Paranoia in a Sample of British Adults

Rusi; id_orcid 0000-0002-8463-9519 Jaspal, Barbara Lopes
MultiPsych
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Trait Characteristics, Exposure to Abusive Dating Behaviours and Paranoia in a Sample of British Adults

Rusi; id_orcid 0000-0002-8463-9519 Jaspal, Barbara Lopes
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This cross‐sectional correlational survey study uses the vulnerability‐stress model to examine interactions between trait characteristics and exposure to abusive dating behaviours (ghosting, breadcrumbing, gaslighting and coercion) and their associations with paranoia. A sample of 544 individuals in the United Kingdom provided socio‐demographic information and then completed measures of ghosting, breadcrumbing, gaslighting, coercion, attachment style, rejection sensitivity, identity resilience self‐esteem and paranoia. Two generalised linear models showed that being single interacted with breadcrumbing to predict higher paranoia; that rejection sensitivity and anxious and close attachment interacted with ghosting to predict higher and lower paranoia, respectively; and that being single and anxious attachment style interacted with gaslighting and coercion to predict higher paranoia. People with certain trait characteristics may be more or less prone to paranoia when exposed to the common abusive behaviours of ghosting, breadcrumbing, gaslighting and coercion from a dating partner. Psychological interventions should focus on developing secure working attachment models and identity resilience self‐esteem to reduce the risk of paranoia in people faced with abusive dating behaviours.

MultiPsychVol. 1(2)
Brighton and Hove City Council (GB), University of Brighton (GB), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.