The human cost of exploitation: Expert insights on estimating the Global Burden of Disease of migrant labour exploitation

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) remains the most widely accepted metric in quantifying health burdens of disease states and risk factors globally. Studies have attempted to quantify the GBD associated with work-related exposures and conditions, but none have focused on migrant workers, who are known to experience higher risks of work-related injuries and deaths, and diverse forms of abuse and exploitation. Moreover, few studies have critically reflected on the GBD methodology from an interdisciplinary perspective, or explored expanding the GBD methods to account for non-disease-related risk factors. This qualitative study presents findings from interviews with 11 experts with diverse disciplinary backgrounds from academia or UN agencies, many of whom have produced burden of disease estimates, to identify data and methodological challenges, evidence needs, and potential uses for new GBD estimates on labour exploitation in migrant populations. The most common challenges included difficulty of defining and operationalizing the exposure “labour exploitation” in migrant populations, scarcity of datasets with migrants’ work and health data, challenges gathering data among vulnerable migrants, and difficulty establishing causality to obtain attributable fractions required in GBD estimations. Despite these challenges, experts agreed that such global estimates would be valuable in quantifying the social and economic costs of labour exploitation among migrants, which can be used to advance migrants’ right to a safe and healthy working environment. Nevertheless, experts cautioned that such global estimates could easily be misused or misinterpreted by end users, thus it is important to make clear the assumptions and limitations when presenting findings. • The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) of labour exploitation in migrants is unknown. • Experts agree on the value of GBD for quantifying the health impacts of labour exploitation. • GBD estimates can advance safe and healthy work and employment conditions. • GBD challenges include defining exploitation, data scarcity, and proving causality. • GBD assumptions and limitations must be clear to avoid misuse or misinterpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100786
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The human cost of exploitation: Expert insights on estimating the Global Burden of Disease of migrant labour exploitation

Sally Hargreaves, Cathy Zimmerman, Karen Lau, Ligia Kiss
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
article

The human cost of exploitation: Expert insights on estimating the Global Burden of Disease of migrant labour exploitation

Sally Hargreaves, Cathy Zimmerman, Karen Lau, Ligia Kiss
article en

Abstract

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) remains the most widely accepted metric in quantifying health burdens of disease states and risk factors globally. Studies have attempted to quantify the GBD associated with work-related exposures and conditions, but none have focused on migrant workers, who are known to experience higher risks of work-related injuries and deaths, and diverse forms of abuse and exploitation. Moreover, few studies have critically reflected on the GBD methodology from an interdisciplinary perspective, or explored expanding the GBD methods to account for non-disease-related risk factors. This qualitative study presents findings from interviews with 11 experts with diverse disciplinary backgrounds from academia or UN agencies, many of whom have produced burden of disease estimates, to identify data and methodological challenges, evidence needs, and potential uses for new GBD estimates on labour exploitation in migrant populations. The most common challenges included difficulty of defining and operationalizing the exposure “labour exploitation” in migrant populations, scarcity of datasets with migrants’ work and health data, challenges gathering data among vulnerable migrants, and difficulty establishing causality to obtain attributable fractions required in GBD estimations. Despite these challenges, experts agreed that such global estimates would be valuable in quantifying the social and economic costs of labour exploitation among migrants, which can be used to advance migrants’ right to a safe and healthy working environment. Nevertheless, experts cautioned that such global estimates could easily be misused or misinterpreted by end users, thus it is important to make clear the assumptions and limitations when presenting findings. • The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) of labour exploitation in migrants is unknown. • Experts agree on the value of GBD for quantifying the health impacts of labour exploitation. • GBD estimates can advance safe and healthy work and employment conditions. • GBD challenges include defining exploitation, data scarcity, and proving causality. • GBD assumptions and limitations must be clear to avoid misuse or misinterpretation.

SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
St George's, University of London (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Faculty of Public Health (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.