Risk Assessment of Non‐Urinary Tract Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy Based on <scp>CheckMate</scp> 274 Trial Eligibility: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of non-urinary tract recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for patients with upper urinary tract carcinoma according to CheckMate 274 trial eligibility. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy between 2012 and 2022 for upper urinary tract carcinoma. Recurrence was defined as extra-urinary tract recurrence. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine the risk factors for recurrence according to CheckMate 274 trial eligibility. RESULTS: Among 545 patients, 127 (23.3%) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. Three-hundred sixty two (66.4%) patients were not eligible for CheckMate 274 trial criteria while 183 (33.6%) patients were eligible. The multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative renal dysfunction (HR2.24, 95% CI: 1.37-3.65, p = 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR1.89, 95% CI: 1.18-3.00, p = 0.008)., positive resection margin (HR2.58, 95% CI: 1.43-4.66, p = 0.002), positive lymph node status (HR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.21-4.55, p = 0.012) were risk factors for CheckMate 274 eligible patients. On the other hand, among 362 ineligible patients, performing preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy (HR 3.09, 95% CI: 1.55-6.17, p = 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR3.81, 95% CI: 1.78-8.17, p < 0.001), presence of histological subtype (HR4.82, 95% CI: 1.91-12.13, p < 0.001) and pathological T2 stage (HR2.28, 95% CI: 1.08-4.81, p = 0.031) were risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it may be possible to discuss the needs of adjuvant treatment in each individual. These findings provide a basis for more informed decisions regarding adjuvant therapy in UTUC, with the potential to reduce unnecessary treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Urology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70497
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Assessment of Non‐Urinary Tract Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy Based on CheckMate 274 Trial Eligibility: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Shintaro Miyamoto, Kosuke Shibamori, Hideki Adachi, Genki Kobayashi et al.
International Journal of Urology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Risk Assessment of Non‐Urinary Tract Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy Based on CheckMate 274 Trial Eligibility: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Shintaro Miyamoto, Kosuke Shibamori, Hideki Adachi, Genki Kobayashi, Yuki Kyoda, Atsushi Wanifuchi, Akio Takayanagi, Yohei Ueki, 小林 亘, Shuichi Kato, Tetsuya Shindo, Ippei Muranaka, Masanori Matsukawa, Yasuharu Kunishima, Toshiaki Tanaka, Naoya Masumori, Kohei Hashimoto, Shunsuke Sato, Manabu Okada, Ryuichi Kato
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of non-urinary tract recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for patients with upper urinary tract carcinoma according to CheckMate 274 trial eligibility. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy between 2012 and 2022 for upper urinary tract carcinoma. Recurrence was defined as extra-urinary tract recurrence. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine the risk factors for recurrence according to CheckMate 274 trial eligibility. RESULTS: Among 545 patients, 127 (23.3%) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. Three-hundred sixty two (66.4%) patients were not eligible for CheckMate 274 trial criteria while 183 (33.6%) patients were eligible. The multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative renal dysfunction (HR2.24, 95% CI: 1.37-3.65, p = 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR1.89, 95% CI: 1.18-3.00, p = 0.008)., positive resection margin (HR2.58, 95% CI: 1.43-4.66, p = 0.002), positive lymph node status (HR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.21-4.55, p = 0.012) were risk factors for CheckMate 274 eligible patients. On the other hand, among 362 ineligible patients, performing preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy (HR 3.09, 95% CI: 1.55-6.17, p = 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR3.81, 95% CI: 1.78-8.17, p < 0.001), presence of histological subtype (HR4.82, 95% CI: 1.91-12.13, p < 0.001) and pathological T2 stage (HR2.28, 95% CI: 1.08-4.81, p = 0.031) were risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it may be possible to discuss the needs of adjuvant treatment in each individual. These findings provide a basis for more informed decisions regarding adjuvant therapy in UTUC, with the potential to reduce unnecessary treatment.

International Journal of UrologyVol. 33(5)
Sapporo Medical University (JP), NTT Medical Center (JP), Muroran Institute of Technology (JP), Otaru Municipal Hospital (JP), Obihiro Kyokai Hospital (JP), Kushiro Rosai Hospital (JP), Oji General Hospital (JP), Hokkaido hospital (JP), Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital (JP), Sunagawa City Medical Center (JP), Hakodate National Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.