Late Modernity, Neoliberalism, and the Culture of Control: Examining Country-Level Variation in the Sources of Public Punitiveness

The predominant scholarly accounts of the punitive turn originated in the Global North to make sense of the penal changes occurring in the industrialized countries. We examine whether these narratives constitute universal accounts of the mechanisms that promote punitive sentiments or depict idiosyncratic processes affecting the Global North. Using public opinion data from 70 countries, we examine the association between rejection of late modernity values (e.g., democratization, secularization, rejection of traditional forms of authority, self-expression, autonomy, and equality) and a culture of individual responsibility and support for the death penalty. Following Garland and Wacquant, we explore cross-country differences in the level of penetration of late modernity values and the expansion of neoliberalism. Our results show that neither late modernity penetration nor neoliberalism explain country-level punitiveness but moderate the individual-level sources of punitiveness. Specifically, the culture of control explanation is more salient in countries where late modernity values are widespread while the expansion of neoliberal policies does not amplify this association.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Criminology
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-026-00219-2
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Late Modernity, Neoliberalism, and the Culture of Control: Examining Country-Level Variation in the Sources of Public Punitiveness

Cecilia Chouhy, Sylwia Piatkowska
International Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Late Modernity, Neoliberalism, and the Culture of Control: Examining Country-Level Variation in the Sources of Public Punitiveness

Cecilia Chouhy, Sylwia Piatkowska
article en

Abstract

The predominant scholarly accounts of the punitive turn originated in the Global North to make sense of the penal changes occurring in the industrialized countries. We examine whether these narratives constitute universal accounts of the mechanisms that promote punitive sentiments or depict idiosyncratic processes affecting the Global North. Using public opinion data from 70 countries, we examine the association between rejection of late modernity values (e.g., democratization, secularization, rejection of traditional forms of authority, self-expression, autonomy, and equality) and a culture of individual responsibility and support for the death penalty. Following Garland and Wacquant, we explore cross-country differences in the level of penetration of late modernity values and the expansion of neoliberalism. Our results show that neither late modernity penetration nor neoliberalism explain country-level punitiveness but moderate the individual-level sources of punitiveness. Specifically, the culture of control explanation is more salient in countries where late modernity values are widespread while the expansion of neoliberal policies does not amplify this association.

International Criminology
Florida State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.