Primary High-Grade Spinal Sarcomas: A Retrospective Review of 10 Cases

Introduction: Aggressive surgical resection with adequate margins is associated with improved local control and survival in selected patients with primary spinal sarcomas. However, anatomical constraints often preclude complete resection, and outcomes for unresectable tumors remain poor. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare oncological and functional outcomes between patients with primary spinal sarcomas who underwent surgical resection with reconstruction and those who were managed without resection. Methods: Ten patients with primary spinal sarcomas treated between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Six patients underwent surgical resection with spinal reconstruction (R group), and four were treated without resection (N group). The mean age was 51.8 years (range, 15-71 years) in the R group and 73.0 years (range, 53-91 years) in the N group. Clinical variables, recurrence, metastasis, overall survival (OS), and activities of daily living (ADL), including ambulatory status, were evaluated. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Tumor size at initial presentation was comparable between the groups (48.3 mm (range, 24 mm-68 mm) in the R group and 48.8 mm (range, 38mm-75 mm) in the N group). Metastases occurred in three patients (50%) in the R group and three patients (75%) in the N group. Two patients (33%) in the R group remained disease-free, whereas all patients in the N group died during follow-up. The five-year OS rate was 60% in the R group and 0% in the N group, with no significant difference (p=0.23). Ambulatory function was preserved in five patients (83%) in the R group and one patient (25%) in the N group. Conclusions: Although a definitive survival benefit could not be demonstrated, surgical resection with reconstruction was associated with superior postoperative functional outcomes, suggesting a role in preserving ambulation and quality of life in patients with primary spinal sarcomas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108569
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary High-Grade Spinal Sarcomas: A Retrospective Review of 10 Cases

Hiroyuki Tsuchie, Yasutaka Murahashi, Junya Shimizu, Naoya Nakahashi et al.
Cureus
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Primary High-Grade Spinal Sarcomas: A Retrospective Review of 10 Cases

Hiroyuki Tsuchie, Yasutaka Murahashi, Junya Shimizu, Naoya Nakahashi, Ryunosuke Fukushi, Makoto Emori, Atsushi Teramoto, Naohisa Miyakoshi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Aggressive surgical resection with adequate margins is associated with improved local control and survival in selected patients with primary spinal sarcomas. However, anatomical constraints often preclude complete resection, and outcomes for unresectable tumors remain poor. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare oncological and functional outcomes between patients with primary spinal sarcomas who underwent surgical resection with reconstruction and those who were managed without resection. Methods: Ten patients with primary spinal sarcomas treated between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Six patients underwent surgical resection with spinal reconstruction (R group), and four were treated without resection (N group). The mean age was 51.8 years (range, 15-71 years) in the R group and 73.0 years (range, 53-91 years) in the N group. Clinical variables, recurrence, metastasis, overall survival (OS), and activities of daily living (ADL), including ambulatory status, were evaluated. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Tumor size at initial presentation was comparable between the groups (48.3 mm (range, 24 mm-68 mm) in the R group and 48.8 mm (range, 38mm-75 mm) in the N group). Metastases occurred in three patients (50%) in the R group and three patients (75%) in the N group. Two patients (33%) in the R group remained disease-free, whereas all patients in the N group died during follow-up. The five-year OS rate was 60% in the R group and 0% in the N group, with no significant difference (p=0.23). Ambulatory function was preserved in five patients (83%) in the R group and one patient (25%) in the N group. Conclusions: Although a definitive survival benefit could not be demonstrated, surgical resection with reconstruction was associated with superior postoperative functional outcomes, suggesting a role in preserving ambulation and quality of life in patients with primary spinal sarcomas.

Cureus
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.