The “We” and “Me” of Identity in Hazardous Industry Organizations: Face Work Tactics Among Practicing Engineers

In this paper, we use Goffman's notion of “face work” to examine how pipeline engineers perform and present their working selves as competent experts. Our analysis identifies various faces and face work tactics, including a focus on professional judgment, actively selling one's expertise relative to others, protective self‐deprecatory strategies, and positioning self as part of an organization. This face work mostly reflects a focus on the individual that is out of step with typical explanations of structure and agency in studies of engineering work and disaster causation. In only rare cases did engineers effectively hide behind their organization in presenting their working selves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symbolic Interaction
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.70050
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “We” and “Me” of Identity in Hazardous Industry Organizations: Face Work Tactics Among Practicing Engineers

Jan Hayes, Michael James Walsh, Sarah Maslen
Symbolic Interaction
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

The “We” and “Me” of Identity in Hazardous Industry Organizations: Face Work Tactics Among Practicing Engineers

Jan Hayes, Michael James Walsh, Sarah Maslen
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we use Goffman's notion of “face work” to examine how pipeline engineers perform and present their working selves as competent experts. Our analysis identifies various faces and face work tactics, including a focus on professional judgment, actively selling one's expertise relative to others, protective self‐deprecatory strategies, and positioning self as part of an organization. This face work mostly reflects a focus on the individual that is out of step with typical explanations of structure and agency in studies of engineering work and disaster causation. In only rare cases did engineers effectively hide behind their organization in presenting their working selves.

Symbolic Interaction
University of Canberra (AU), ACT Government (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.