Strategies for teaching nursing diagnosis in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review

Identify the characteristics of strategies employed in teaching nursing diagnoses in undergraduate nursing programs. The ability to formulate accurate nursing diagnoses is a core component of clinical reasoning and nursing diagnoses are the primary drivers of nursing processes. The optimal approach for students to acquire this competence remains insufficiently understood. Ongoing changes in nursing education have heightened the need to investigate which pedagogical strategies support students in learning and applying diagnostic reasoning. Scoping review conducted following the JBI methodology in March 2025. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was followed. Seven databases were searched. Twenty-nine studies published between 1993 and 2024 were included. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/UC3ZH. Strategies identified include simulation (n=7), virtual tools (n=6), educational programs (n=6), group work (n=3), case studies (n=3) and other methods (n=4), such as board games, outcome present state test model, guided visual metaphorical strategy and arch method. The findings reveal the predominance of active, student-centred methodologies that foster critical thinking and reflective practice. These approaches appear to support the development of diagnostic competence and may contribute to preparation for clinical decision-making. This review point to the need for standardized evaluation tools and longitudinal research to explore the sustainability and scalability of these approaches in diverse educational contexts. Integrating these strategies into undergraduate curricula has the potential to strengthen students’ engagement with clinical decision-making, promote reflective evidence‑based practice and contribute to safer decision‑making processes. Tweetable abstract: Active, student-centred strategies—especially simulation and virtual tools—enhance nursing students’ diagnostic reasoning and documentation, but standardized evaluation and long-term impact remain underexplored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nurse Education in Practice
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104854
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for teaching nursing diagnosis in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review

Anamaria Alves Napoleão, Aline Helena Appoloni Eduardo, Beatriz Amorim Beltrão, Regina Célia dos Santos Diogo et al.
Nurse Education in Practice
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

Strategies for teaching nursing diagnosis in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review

Anamaria Alves Napoleão, Aline Helena Appoloni Eduardo, Beatriz Amorim Beltrão, Regina Célia dos Santos Diogo, Susana Miguel, Marcos Barragan da Silva
article en

Abstract

Identify the characteristics of strategies employed in teaching nursing diagnoses in undergraduate nursing programs. The ability to formulate accurate nursing diagnoses is a core component of clinical reasoning and nursing diagnoses are the primary drivers of nursing processes. The optimal approach for students to acquire this competence remains insufficiently understood. Ongoing changes in nursing education have heightened the need to investigate which pedagogical strategies support students in learning and applying diagnostic reasoning. Scoping review conducted following the JBI methodology in March 2025. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was followed. Seven databases were searched. Twenty-nine studies published between 1993 and 2024 were included. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/UC3ZH. Strategies identified include simulation (n=7), virtual tools (n=6), educational programs (n=6), group work (n=3), case studies (n=3) and other methods (n=4), such as board games, outcome present state test model, guided visual metaphorical strategy and arch method. The findings reveal the predominance of active, student-centred methodologies that foster critical thinking and reflective practice. These approaches appear to support the development of diagnostic competence and may contribute to preparation for clinical decision-making. This review point to the need for standardized evaluation tools and longitudinal research to explore the sustainability and scalability of these approaches in diverse educational contexts. Integrating these strategies into undergraduate curricula has the potential to strengthen students’ engagement with clinical decision-making, promote reflective evidence‑based practice and contribute to safer decision‑making processes. Tweetable abstract: Active, student-centred strategies—especially simulation and virtual tools—enhance nursing students’ diagnostic reasoning and documentation, but standardized evaluation and long-term impact remain underexplored.

Nurse Education in Practice
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.