Soft Skills and Group Performance in Higher Education: A Quantitative Study of Student Teams in Software Engineering

ABSTRACT This study examines how soft skills, technical expertise, weekly progress monitoring, and collaboration preferences affect group performance in software engineering education, where teamwork is essential but often evaluated primarily through technical outcomes. We analyzed data from 118 students across 28 teams engaged in real‐world, project‐based coursework. The data set included self‐ and instructor‐assessed skills, weekly status reports, and final deliverables. Statistical correlation, significance testing, and clustering techniques were employed to identify predictive factors of group success. Technical expertise, particularly the ability to extract core problems, strongly influenced early project performance. In later phases, communication and teamwork emerged as decisive predictors of success. Teams with stronger soft skills achieved more balanced contributions and higher deliverable grades, while collaboration preferences were associated with fairer workload distribution. The findings highlight that integrating structured soft skills assessment and strategic team formation into software engineering curricula enhances team performance and reduces dysfunctional dynamics. This work extends performance prediction beyond technical indicators, providing actionable insights for aligning education with industry expectations and preparing graduates for collaborative professional contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70204
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soft Skills and Group Performance in Higher Education: A Quantitative Study of Student Teams in Software Engineering

Andrea Capiluppi, Kelian Schekkerman
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

Soft Skills and Group Performance in Higher Education: A Quantitative Study of Student Teams in Software Engineering

Andrea Capiluppi, Kelian Schekkerman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how soft skills, technical expertise, weekly progress monitoring, and collaboration preferences affect group performance in software engineering education, where teamwork is essential but often evaluated primarily through technical outcomes. We analyzed data from 118 students across 28 teams engaged in real‐world, project‐based coursework. The data set included self‐ and instructor‐assessed skills, weekly status reports, and final deliverables. Statistical correlation, significance testing, and clustering techniques were employed to identify predictive factors of group success. Technical expertise, particularly the ability to extract core problems, strongly influenced early project performance. In later phases, communication and teamwork emerged as decisive predictors of success. Teams with stronger soft skills achieved more balanced contributions and higher deliverable grades, while collaboration preferences were associated with fairer workload distribution. The findings highlight that integrating structured soft skills assessment and strategic team formation into software engineering curricula enhances team performance and reduces dysfunctional dynamics. This work extends performance prediction beyond technical indicators, providing actionable insights for aligning education with industry expectations and preparing graduates for collaborative professional contexts.

Computer Applications in Engineering EducationVol. 34(3)
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.