Efficacy and Safety of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Managing Lower Limb Amputation; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Individual Patients Data Meta‐Analysis and <scp>GRADE</scp> Assessment

Major lower-limb amputation often leads to wound complications that delay recovery and prosthetic use. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been suggested to improve outcomes, but evidence is inconsistent. The objective of this study is to compare NPWT with standard wound therapy in fresh amputation stumps. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines included randomised and controlled observational trials. Primary outcomes were wound complications, including surgical-site infections (SSI) and wound dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included re-amputation, healing, and resource use. Seventeen papers including over 6745 patients were analysed. NPWT significantly reduced total wound complications (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.66) and SSIs (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.90), including both superficial (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.73) and deep infections (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.63). The secondary amputation risk was lowered by one-third (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.89). Wound dehiscence risk decreased (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.94). Mortality, readmission, and hospital stay showed no significant differences between groups. Healing outcomes strongly favoured NPWT: mean time to ≥ 76% granulation was shortened by 25 days, while complete closure occurred nearly two weeks earlier. Kaplan-Meier reconstruction confirmed that NPWT accelerated wound maturation by 77% (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.12-0.44). Economic evaluations, though limited, indicated fewer dressing changes, reduced outpatient visits, and overall cost savings. NPWT after major lower-limb amputation halves wound complications and infections, lowers re-amputation, and accelerates healing. Despite unchanged systemic outcomes, the local benefits are clinically significant, supporting its use in standard post-amputation care. Trial Registration: CRD420251088214.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70162
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Managing Lower Limb Amputation; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Individual Patients Data Meta‐Analysis and GRADE Assessment

Ali Mohamed Seif, Omar Ahmed Abdelwahab, Mirna Morad Mashhour, Mustafa Makkiyah et al.
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Efficacy and Safety of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Managing Lower Limb Amputation; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis With Individual Patients Data Meta‐Analysis and GRADE Assessment

Ali Mohamed Seif, Omar Ahmed Abdelwahab, Mirna Morad Mashhour, Mustafa Makkiyah, Mohamed Wahb, Miqdad Qandeel, Mohammad Amgad Seddek, Mohamed Elghouneimy, Mohamed H. Khater, Mohamed Fahmy, Abdullah Elrefae
article en

Abstract

Major lower-limb amputation often leads to wound complications that delay recovery and prosthetic use. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been suggested to improve outcomes, but evidence is inconsistent. The objective of this study is to compare NPWT with standard wound therapy in fresh amputation stumps. A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines included randomised and controlled observational trials. Primary outcomes were wound complications, including surgical-site infections (SSI) and wound dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included re-amputation, healing, and resource use. Seventeen papers including over 6745 patients were analysed. NPWT significantly reduced total wound complications (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.66) and SSIs (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.90), including both superficial (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.73) and deep infections (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.63). The secondary amputation risk was lowered by one-third (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.89). Wound dehiscence risk decreased (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.94). Mortality, readmission, and hospital stay showed no significant differences between groups. Healing outcomes strongly favoured NPWT: mean time to ≥ 76% granulation was shortened by 25 days, while complete closure occurred nearly two weeks earlier. Kaplan-Meier reconstruction confirmed that NPWT accelerated wound maturation by 77% (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.12-0.44). Economic evaluations, though limited, indicated fewer dressing changes, reduced outpatient visits, and overall cost savings. NPWT after major lower-limb amputation halves wound complications and infections, lowers re-amputation, and accelerates healing. Despite unchanged systemic outcomes, the local benefits are clinically significant, supporting its use in standard post-amputation care. Trial Registration: CRD420251088214.

Wound Repair and RegenerationVol. 34(3)
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (GB), Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB), Royal College of Surgeons of England (GB), Al-Azhar University (EG), University of Hull (GB), Wexham Park Hospital (GB), Northwick Park Hospital (GB), Hillingdon Hospital (GB), Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.