Reassessing alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease by addressing bias in observational data: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and its relationship with cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains contentious. Several observational studies have found cardio-protective associations, while Mendelian Randomization studies have found null or harmful effects of moderate drinking. Biases, including abstainer misclassification and sick quitter effects, may obscure true associations. It is widely understood that former drinkers are often sick quitters. However, removal of former drinkers from analyses addresses bias in the abstainer group but fails to account for induced survivorship among current drinkers. This study sought to determine whether adjusting for biases altered the association between alcohol and CVD by comparing conventional models with those using (1) occasional drinkers as the reference group instead of lifetime abstainers and (2) intention-to-treat (ITT) reallocation of former drinkers based on past drinking patterns. METHODS: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is a prospective cohort study of 6,814 participants aged 45-84 years between 2000-2002 without baseline CVD. 6,755 participants were included after excluding those with missing data. Alcohol consumption was self-reported and classified as lifetime abstainer, former, or current drinker (occasional [≤1 drink/week], light [2-7 drinks/week], moderate [8-14 drinks/week], heavy [>14 drinks/week]). Outcomes included Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) (0, 1-100, 101-300, and >300), and clinical events (MI, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, composite MACE, and heart failure). RESULTS: Of 6,755 participants, 20.6% were lifetime abstainers, 24.1% former drinkers, and 55.3% current drinkers. Adjusting for biases altered the observed relationship between alcohol and CVD, showing increased harm with light drinking, decreased protection with moderate drinking, and a dose-response relationship between alcohol and CAC, particularly CAC >300 in adjusted models. Protective associations between moderate drinking and MI (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.38-1.06) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53-1.25) were attenuated and became non-significant. Light drinking shifted from null to increased risk for MI (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92), stroke (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.17-2.03), MACE (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.12-1.57), and heart failure (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.10-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: Associations between alcohol and CVD in observational studies are sensitive to methodologic variation. Results from models correcting for abstainer/sick-quitter biases may help explain discrepant results from previous studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag201
Primary Topic
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease by addressing bias in observational data: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

James Russell Pike, James M. Clay, Tim Stockwell, Michael E. Farkouh et al.
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
article

Reassessing alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease by addressing bias in observational data: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

James Russell Pike, James M. Clay, Tim Stockwell, Michael E. Farkouh, Elizabeth K. Farkouh, G B Ganga Bey, Timothy Naimi, Matthew Budoff, Khurram Nasir, Shantanu Srivatsa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and its relationship with cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains contentious. Several observational studies have found cardio-protective associations, while Mendelian Randomization studies have found null or harmful effects of moderate drinking. Biases, including abstainer misclassification and sick quitter effects, may obscure true associations. It is widely understood that former drinkers are often sick quitters. However, removal of former drinkers from analyses addresses bias in the abstainer group but fails to account for induced survivorship among current drinkers. This study sought to determine whether adjusting for biases altered the association between alcohol and CVD by comparing conventional models with those using (1) occasional drinkers as the reference group instead of lifetime abstainers and (2) intention-to-treat (ITT) reallocation of former drinkers based on past drinking patterns. METHODS: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is a prospective cohort study of 6,814 participants aged 45-84 years between 2000-2002 without baseline CVD. 6,755 participants were included after excluding those with missing data. Alcohol consumption was self-reported and classified as lifetime abstainer, former, or current drinker (occasional [≤1 drink/week], light [2-7 drinks/week], moderate [8-14 drinks/week], heavy [>14 drinks/week]). Outcomes included Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) (0, 1-100, 101-300, and >300), and clinical events (MI, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, composite MACE, and heart failure). RESULTS: Of 6,755 participants, 20.6% were lifetime abstainers, 24.1% former drinkers, and 55.3% current drinkers. Adjusting for biases altered the observed relationship between alcohol and CVD, showing increased harm with light drinking, decreased protection with moderate drinking, and a dose-response relationship between alcohol and CAC, particularly CAC >300 in adjusted models. Protective associations between moderate drinking and MI (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.38-1.06) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53-1.25) were attenuated and became non-significant. Light drinking shifted from null to increased risk for MI (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92), stroke (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.17-2.03), MACE (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.12-1.57), and heart failure (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.10-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: Associations between alcohol and CVD in observational studies are sensitive to methodologic variation. Results from models correcting for abstainer/sick-quitter biases may help explain discrepant results from previous studies.

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Houston Methodist (US), University of North Carolina Health Care (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Sinai Health System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.