Grounded theory modeling based on evidence fusion with group consensus reaching

Abstract Grounded theory, a qualitative research method, typically relies on collaborative, subjective analysis among researchers. However, such subjective collaborative processes often raise concerns regarding transparency, consistency, and reliability of the results. In this study, we introduce a novel quantitative approach, Grounded Theory Modeling based on Evidence Fusion and Group Consensus Reaching (GCR-GT), to provide a clear and systematic procedural guideline for the collaborative process. GCR-GT quantitatively captures researchers’ judgments through evidence-based functions and employs a structured consensus-reaching mechanism, transforming the qualitatively ambiguous theory-building and collaborative processes into clear, quantitative computational steps. Specifically, researchers construct initial relationships between concepts based on evidence extracted from data, which are represented as belief distribution functions. These functions undergo multi-round consensus evaluation and iterative feedback adjustments until group consensus is achieved. During this process, uncertainty and similarity are used to quantitatively measure the weight and reliability of each researcher’s opinion, and the analytical generalized combination (AGC) rule is used to fuse group opinions and integrate relationships across coding hierarchies. After reaching a consensus, the opinions are further integrated to determine the strength of the relationship between concepts and categories, forming the theoretical framework. Finally, this study validates the practicality and effectiveness of the method through a case study on the driving mechanisms of artificial intelligence-enabled mass personalization. This method not only enhances the scientific rigor and effectiveness of collaborative grounded theory processes but also provides a generalizable methodological perspective for collaborative qualitative research in the social sciences and related fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07468-6
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grounded theory modeling based on evidence fusion with group consensus reaching

Jiao-Jiao Zhong, Yi‐Pin Fan, Yuan-Wei Du, Juan Antonio Morente-Molinera
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
article

Grounded theory modeling based on evidence fusion with group consensus reaching

Jiao-Jiao Zhong, Yi‐Pin Fan, Yuan-Wei Du, Juan Antonio Morente-Molinera
article en

Abstract

Abstract Grounded theory, a qualitative research method, typically relies on collaborative, subjective analysis among researchers. However, such subjective collaborative processes often raise concerns regarding transparency, consistency, and reliability of the results. In this study, we introduce a novel quantitative approach, Grounded Theory Modeling based on Evidence Fusion and Group Consensus Reaching (GCR-GT), to provide a clear and systematic procedural guideline for the collaborative process. GCR-GT quantitatively captures researchers’ judgments through evidence-based functions and employs a structured consensus-reaching mechanism, transforming the qualitatively ambiguous theory-building and collaborative processes into clear, quantitative computational steps. Specifically, researchers construct initial relationships between concepts based on evidence extracted from data, which are represented as belief distribution functions. These functions undergo multi-round consensus evaluation and iterative feedback adjustments until group consensus is achieved. During this process, uncertainty and similarity are used to quantitatively measure the weight and reliability of each researcher’s opinion, and the analytical generalized combination (AGC) rule is used to fuse group opinions and integrate relationships across coding hierarchies. After reaching a consensus, the opinions are further integrated to determine the strength of the relationship between concepts and categories, forming the theoretical framework. Finally, this study validates the practicality and effectiveness of the method through a case study on the driving mechanisms of artificial intelligence-enabled mass personalization. This method not only enhances the scientific rigor and effectiveness of collaborative grounded theory processes but also provides a generalizable methodological perspective for collaborative qualitative research in the social sciences and related fields.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Universidad de Granada (ES), Yunnan University (CN), Ocean University of China (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.