Traditional Chinese medicine therapies for chronic nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundChronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a common clinical condition, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapies have been shown to effectively alleviate patient discomfort.ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the efficacy of different TCM therapies in the treatment of CNLBP.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials on TCM therapies for CNLBP. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of various interventions, with therapeutic effects ranked by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).ResultsMeta-analysis showed that for the Visual Analogue Scale, moxibustion (SMD = -2.08; 95% CI, -3.75 to -0.42; p = 0.0143), cupping (SMD = -5.69; 95% CI, -7.60 to -3.77; p < 0.00001), acupuncture (SMD = -0.94; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.54; p < 0.00001), acupuncture combined with cupping(SMD = -6.65; 95% CI, -9.03 to -4.27; p < 0.0001), and traditional Chinese exercises (SMD = -1.86; 95% CI, -2.73 to -0.99; p < 0.00001) all showed significant effectiveness. The SUCRA ranking of effectiveness for these therapies was as follows: traditional Chinese exercises > moxibustion > acupuncture combined with cupping > acupuncture > cupping. Regarding the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, both moxibustion (SMD = -1.54; 95% CI, -3.00 to -0.07; p = 0.0397) and acupuncture (SMD = -0.79; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.31; p = 0.0013) showed significant therapeutic benefits. The SUCRA ranking for these treatments was: moxibustion > acupuncture. Regarding the Oswestry Disability Index, acupuncture (SMD = -1.40; 95% CI, -2.54 to -0.26; p = 0.0159) showed a significant advantage.ConclusionTCM can effectively alleviate symptoms in patients with CNLBP through multiple mechanisms. Among these interventions, traditional Chinese exercises have shown the greatest efficacy in pain relief, while acupuncture provides broader benefits across various outcome measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261435659
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional Chinese medicine therapies for chronic nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Jiali Ding, Yujie Wan, Mengmeng Fan, Hailiang Huang
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Traditional Chinese medicine therapies for chronic nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Jiali Ding, Yujie Wan, Mengmeng Fan, Hailiang Huang
article en

Abstract

BackgroundChronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a common clinical condition, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapies have been shown to effectively alleviate patient discomfort.ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the efficacy of different TCM therapies in the treatment of CNLBP.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials on TCM therapies for CNLBP. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of various interventions, with therapeutic effects ranked by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).ResultsMeta-analysis showed that for the Visual Analogue Scale, moxibustion (SMD = -2.08; 95% CI, -3.75 to -0.42; p = 0.0143), cupping (SMD = -5.69; 95% CI, -7.60 to -3.77; p < 0.00001), acupuncture (SMD = -0.94; 95% CI, -1.33 to -0.54; p < 0.00001), acupuncture combined with cupping(SMD = -6.65; 95% CI, -9.03 to -4.27; p < 0.0001), and traditional Chinese exercises (SMD = -1.86; 95% CI, -2.73 to -0.99; p < 0.00001) all showed significant effectiveness. The SUCRA ranking of effectiveness for these therapies was as follows: traditional Chinese exercises > moxibustion > acupuncture combined with cupping > acupuncture > cupping. Regarding the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, both moxibustion (SMD = -1.54; 95% CI, -3.00 to -0.07; p = 0.0397) and acupuncture (SMD = -0.79; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.31; p = 0.0013) showed significant therapeutic benefits. The SUCRA ranking for these treatments was: moxibustion > acupuncture. Regarding the Oswestry Disability Index, acupuncture (SMD = -1.40; 95% CI, -2.54 to -0.26; p = 0.0159) showed a significant advantage.ConclusionTCM can effectively alleviate symptoms in patients with CNLBP through multiple mechanisms. Among these interventions, traditional Chinese exercises have shown the greatest efficacy in pain relief, while acupuncture provides broader benefits across various outcome measures.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.