Genomic newborn screening: a scoping review of the field’s evolution and associated ethical, legal, and social implications

The integration of genomic sequencing into newborn screening (genomic newborn screening; gNBS) has the potential to identify more presymptomatic babies who could benefit from early intervention compared to traditional universal newborn screening (NBS). Realizing these benefits requires careful navigation of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) to minimize harms, promote equity, and maintain trust in NBS programs. The primary objective of this scoping review is to synthesize the ELSI discussed in the gNBS literature, to support implementation and identify knowledge gaps. A secondary objective is to characterize the landscape and contours of the gNBS field. This review, conducted in July 2025, includes academic literature addressing genomic sequencing as a first‑line NBS screen. ELSI were identified within each publication, and these informed the development of a set of decision points with ELSI dimensions within gNBS. A total of 485 publications met inclusion criteria, with the first published in 1987. The volume of publications increased over time, with growing proportions of empirical studies and work associated with gNBS projects, alongside a decreasing proportion of publications from North America. In total, 3781 ELSI considerations were charted using AI-assisted methods, relevant to 59 decision points organized into nine areas. Current scholarship is concentrated on early implementation questions, while long‑term operational needs-such as data stewardship, clinical follow‑up, and sustainable governance-remain underexplored. These gaps, together with limited contributions from many regions due to a multitude of factors, highlight the need for more diverse, empirically grounded, and forward‑looking research to support responsible decisions around gNBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02108-8
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic newborn screening: a scoping review of the field’s evolution and associated ethical, legal, and social implications

Paul Bain, Subhashini Jagu, Bimal P. Chaudhari, Gemma L. Brown et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Genomic newborn screening: a scoping review of the field’s evolution and associated ethical, legal, and social implications

Paul Bain, Subhashini Jagu, Bimal P. Chaudhari, Gemma L. Brown, Ainsley J. Newson, Ziyi Dai, RC Green, JN Friedman, Aliza Wilson, Loren Walker, Zornitza Stark, Anna C F Lewis, Mutiat A Afolabi, Yvonne Bombard, Ana Bonilha, John Christodoulou, Danya F Vears, Bartha M Knoppers, Amy Gaviglio
article en

Abstract

The integration of genomic sequencing into newborn screening (genomic newborn screening; gNBS) has the potential to identify more presymptomatic babies who could benefit from early intervention compared to traditional universal newborn screening (NBS). Realizing these benefits requires careful navigation of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) to minimize harms, promote equity, and maintain trust in NBS programs. The primary objective of this scoping review is to synthesize the ELSI discussed in the gNBS literature, to support implementation and identify knowledge gaps. A secondary objective is to characterize the landscape and contours of the gNBS field. This review, conducted in July 2025, includes academic literature addressing genomic sequencing as a first‑line NBS screen. ELSI were identified within each publication, and these informed the development of a set of decision points with ELSI dimensions within gNBS. A total of 485 publications met inclusion criteria, with the first published in 1987. The volume of publications increased over time, with growing proportions of empirical studies and work associated with gNBS projects, alongside a decreasing proportion of publications from North America. In total, 3781 ELSI considerations were charted using AI-assisted methods, relevant to 59 decision points organized into nine areas. Current scholarship is concentrated on early implementation questions, while long‑term operational needs-such as data stewardship, clinical follow‑up, and sustainable governance-remain underexplored. These gaps, together with limited contributions from many regions due to a multitude of factors, highlight the need for more diverse, empirically grounded, and forward‑looking research to support responsible decisions around gNBS.

European Journal of Human Genetics
Broad Institute (US), The University of Sydney (AU), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Deakin University (AU), University of Leicester (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Toronto (CA), Loyola University Chicago (US), Boston Public Library (US), Humanetics Corporation (United States) (US), Wellcome Connecting Science (GB), Sydney Local Health District (AU), National Cancer Institute (US), SickKids Foundation (CA), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), BC Children's Hospital (CA), Ariadne Diagnostics (United States) (US), Unity Health Toronto, Mass General Brigham (US), McGill University (CA), The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.