Risk factors for colonisation and infection with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There are currently two opposing hypotheses regarding the risk factors for acquisition, colonisation and infection with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Acquisition could be either endogenous or exogenous or both. It is of great interest to estimate pooled prevalence and describe individual and environmental factors associated with the colonisation and infection with MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units. METHODS: test was performed to assess the statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. The publication bias was assessed by using the funnel plot and Egger's test. Descriptive analysis and meta-analysis were performed. Fixed effect model were used to calculate the surveyed prevalence and odds ratio (OR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: A total of 10,791 articles were identified, of which 13 were retained for descriptive analysis and 8 for meta-analysis. The majority of these 13 studies were conducted in Western countries. Methods were heterogeneous and few studies addressed environmental factors. The pooled prevalence of MDR-PA in the ICU was 4% (95% CI: 0%-11%). Identified risk factors were: length of stay in ICU (> 8 days), mechanical ventilation with OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 2.25-4.53, use of invasive devices with OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.40-3.68 (use of central venous catheter with OR: 3.16 95% CI: 1.87-5.33, the use of urinary catheters with OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 2.05-3.44, the use of parenteral nutrition with OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.15-5.16 and the use of arterial catheters with OR: 7.00; 95% CI: 2.77-17.68) and the use of antibiotics with OR: 3.69; 95% CI: 3.16-4.27 (carbapenem with OR: 4.12; 95% CI: 3.29-5.16, quinolones with OR: 3.31; 95% CI: 2.45-4.47, bectalactam with OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 2.4-5.24, and aminoglycosides with OR: 3.32; 95% CI: 2.33-4.73) and environmental factors. CONCLUSION: All this suggest that acquisition or infection by MDR-PA in ICU could be due to endogenous and exogenous transmission. Due to the few numbers of studies analysed, further investigation with more studies is needed to draw definitive conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol of this review has been registered under CRD42021233832 in PROSPERO and has been published on Systematic review on November 2022. Eyebe et al. (Syst Rev 11:270, 2022).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Reviews
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02975-0
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors for colonisation and infection with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guy Sadeu Wafeu, Pierre Ongolo‐Zogo, Alain Bertrand Dongmo, Chritine Danielle Evina et al.
Systematic Reviews
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Risk factors for colonisation and infection with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guy Sadeu Wafeu, Pierre Ongolo‐Zogo, Alain Bertrand Dongmo, Chritine Danielle Evina, Serge Eyebe, Emilia Lyonga Mbamyah, Arthur Mbida
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are currently two opposing hypotheses regarding the risk factors for acquisition, colonisation and infection with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Acquisition could be either endogenous or exogenous or both. It is of great interest to estimate pooled prevalence and describe individual and environmental factors associated with the colonisation and infection with MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units. METHODS: test was performed to assess the statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. The publication bias was assessed by using the funnel plot and Egger's test. Descriptive analysis and meta-analysis were performed. Fixed effect model were used to calculate the surveyed prevalence and odds ratio (OR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: A total of 10,791 articles were identified, of which 13 were retained for descriptive analysis and 8 for meta-analysis. The majority of these 13 studies were conducted in Western countries. Methods were heterogeneous and few studies addressed environmental factors. The pooled prevalence of MDR-PA in the ICU was 4% (95% CI: 0%-11%). Identified risk factors were: length of stay in ICU (> 8 days), mechanical ventilation with OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 2.25-4.53, use of invasive devices with OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.40-3.68 (use of central venous catheter with OR: 3.16 95% CI: 1.87-5.33, the use of urinary catheters with OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 2.05-3.44, the use of parenteral nutrition with OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.15-5.16 and the use of arterial catheters with OR: 7.00; 95% CI: 2.77-17.68) and the use of antibiotics with OR: 3.69; 95% CI: 3.16-4.27 (carbapenem with OR: 4.12; 95% CI: 3.29-5.16, quinolones with OR: 3.31; 95% CI: 2.45-4.47, bectalactam with OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 2.4-5.24, and aminoglycosides with OR: 3.32; 95% CI: 2.33-4.73) and environmental factors. CONCLUSION: All this suggest that acquisition or infection by MDR-PA in ICU could be due to endogenous and exogenous transmission. Due to the few numbers of studies analysed, further investigation with more studies is needed to draw definitive conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol of this review has been registered under CRD42021233832 in PROSPERO and has been published on Systematic review on November 2022. Eyebe et al. (Syst Rev 11:270, 2022).

Systematic Reviews
Université de Yaoundé I (CM), University of Douala (CM), University of Cambodia (KH), Institut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement (CM), Yaoundé Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital (CM)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.