The Student Grouping Study. Evaluation report

The project<br/>The Student Grouping Study aimed to compare directly the impact of being taught mathematics in mixed attainment groups or in attainment sets on mathematics attainment and self-confidence, for Year 7 and Year 8 students (age 11–13). Of particular interest were outcomes for disadvantaged students, and outcomes for students with low-prior attainment. This was a naturalistic quasi-experimental study that investigated the effects of setting by attainment and mixed attainment grouping in mathematics, comparing schools with established grouping practices. The evaluation used a matched design, meaning that two groups of schools were deliberately made as similar as possible on a broad range of observable characteristics before comparing the outcomes. Schools were recruited on the basis of their usual practices in grouping for mathematics teaching. 28 mixed attainment schools were recruited, followed by 69 matched schools that used setting by attainment. The study took place between September 2022 and July 2024. There were significant delays in accessing data from the National Pupil Database, which meant this report is published later than anticipated. The implementation and process evaluation (IPE) consisted of surveys in all participating schools, of heads of mathematics, mathematics teachers, school leaders, and students. Additionally, 12 schools were randomly selected for in-depth qualitative case studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2026-04-29
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Student Grouping Study. Evaluation report

Antonina Tereshchenko, Jeremy Hodgen, Nicola Bretscher, Laurie Jacques et al.
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

The Student Grouping Study. Evaluation report

Antonina Tereshchenko, Jeremy Hodgen, Nicola Bretscher, Laurie Jacques, Hester Burn, Becky Taylor, David Sirl, Maria; id_orcid 0000-0002-9780-3859 Cockerill, Jake Anders, Rosa Kwok
article en

Abstract

The project<br/>The Student Grouping Study aimed to compare directly the impact of being taught mathematics in mixed attainment groups or in attainment sets on mathematics attainment and self-confidence, for Year 7 and Year 8 students (age 11–13). Of particular interest were outcomes for disadvantaged students, and outcomes for students with low-prior attainment. This was a naturalistic quasi-experimental study that investigated the effects of setting by attainment and mixed attainment grouping in mathematics, comparing schools with established grouping practices. The evaluation used a matched design, meaning that two groups of schools were deliberately made as similar as possible on a broad range of observable characteristics before comparing the outcomes. Schools were recruited on the basis of their usual practices in grouping for mathematics teaching. 28 mixed attainment schools were recruited, followed by 69 matched schools that used setting by attainment. The study took place between September 2022 and July 2024. There were significant delays in accessing data from the National Pupil Database, which meant this report is published later than anticipated. The implementation and process evaluation (IPE) consisted of surveys in all participating schools, of heads of mathematics, mathematics teachers, school leaders, and students. Additionally, 12 schools were randomly selected for in-depth qualitative case studies.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.