China's Global Security Initiatives and International Order

Western commentators have called China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) an effort to remake the international order. Three years after its introduction, however, it is not clear how this still-opaque proposal will challenge the current security order. This discussion paper shows that the initiative’s features with the most concrete progress—China as a more involved actor, with an approach to global security focussed on domestic and nontraditional challenges—do not necessarily challenge the current order. While there is an undeniable risk that China’s state-centred approach will further promote tools of authoritarianism, there is limited evidence so far that China is seeking to create an alternative authoritarian-led security order. Western policymakers should recognise that China’s increasing involvement in international security is driven by security concerns rather than a desire for geopolitical or ideological dominance. Rather than blanket opposition to the GSI, policymakers concerned about its implications for liberal democracy or geopolitical influence should seek to shape and counteract the spread of the tools of authoritarianism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Published
2026-11-01
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China's Global Security Initiatives and International Order

Jamie J. Gruffydd-Jones
2 links
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

China's Global Security Initiatives and International Order

Jamie J. Gruffydd-Jones
article en

Abstract

Western commentators have called China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) an effort to remake the international order. Three years after its introduction, however, it is not clear how this still-opaque proposal will challenge the current security order. This discussion paper shows that the initiative’s features with the most concrete progress—China as a more involved actor, with an approach to global security focussed on domestic and nontraditional challenges—do not necessarily challenge the current order. While there is an undeniable risk that China’s state-centred approach will further promote tools of authoritarianism, there is limited evidence so far that China is seeking to create an alternative authoritarian-led security order. Western policymakers should recognise that China’s increasing involvement in international security is driven by security concerns rather than a desire for geopolitical or ideological dominance. Rather than blanket opposition to the GSI, policymakers concerned about its implications for liberal democracy or geopolitical influence should seek to shape and counteract the spread of the tools of authoritarianism.

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon