Platform-union negotiation in China: Unified framework and corporate strategies

As global progress on platform labor regulation remains uneven, this study offers empirical evidence of China's platform-union negotiation practice, whereby China has established baseline platform labor regulations aligned with national guidelines through peaceful negotiation processes. Drawing on a case study approach, this study identifies a framework of “quintipartite participation and triple negotiations” to explain the complex dynamics and substantive outcomes of such negotiations. Within the same institutional framework, the two case companies adopted distinct negotiation patterns: a reputation-oriented reactive negotiation pattern and an efficiency-oriented proactive negotiation pattern, which reflects platform companies’ context-specific strategic choices. While China's platform-union negotiation model facilitates national systemic development, it raises questions about how to balance the inherently bottom-up, worker-participatory nature of collective negotiation and China's top-down, state-led governance regime. It is imperative for China to advance the collective negotiation mechanism by enhancing procedural justice and connecting it with outcome legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Relations
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856261447531
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platform-union negotiation in China: Unified framework and corporate strategies

Xiaojing Zheng, Quan Meng
Journal of Industrial Relations
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Platform-union negotiation in China: Unified framework and corporate strategies

Xiaojing Zheng, Quan Meng
article en

Abstract

As global progress on platform labor regulation remains uneven, this study offers empirical evidence of China's platform-union negotiation practice, whereby China has established baseline platform labor regulations aligned with national guidelines through peaceful negotiation processes. Drawing on a case study approach, this study identifies a framework of “quintipartite participation and triple negotiations” to explain the complex dynamics and substantive outcomes of such negotiations. Within the same institutional framework, the two case companies adopted distinct negotiation patterns: a reputation-oriented reactive negotiation pattern and an efficiency-oriented proactive negotiation pattern, which reflects platform companies’ context-specific strategic choices. While China's platform-union negotiation model facilitates national systemic development, it raises questions about how to balance the inherently bottom-up, worker-participatory nature of collective negotiation and China's top-down, state-led governance regime. It is imperative for China to advance the collective negotiation mechanism by enhancing procedural justice and connecting it with outcome legitimacy.

Journal of Industrial Relations
China University of Labor Relations (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.