Measuring agentic capacity: cross-cultural validation of the adolescent girls agency scale (AGAS)

Abstract This paper presents the development and psychometric validation of the Adolescent Girls Agency scale (AGAS), a novel instrument specifically designed to measure agentic capacity among girls in East and Southern Africa. Addressing a critical gap in evaluation tools, the AGAS provides a structured framework for assessing girls’ agentic capacity across four distinct domains: self-beliefs, gendered environmental beliefs, self-governance skills, and leadership skills. The validation process employed a rigorous mixed-methods design, integrating qualitative cognitive interviews to ensure cultural relevance and clarity with item response theory analyses to assess psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, and to guide iterative scale refinement. Triangulation of statistical evidence on items requiring further review with stakeholder feedback ensured that the instrument reflected the lived experiences of girls in the target region while aligning with programmatic objectives. The resulting final version of the AGAS provides a robust tool for pre–post evaluation of interventions aimed at strengthening girls’ agentic capacity in East Africa. By offering domain-specific insights into how programs influence different dimensions of agency, the AGAS supports targeted program improvements and more informed decision-making. While three of the AGAS’s four domains are hypothesized to be universal, further research is required to establish reliability and validity across diverse settings to support recommendations for adaptation in other comparable global contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07459-7
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring agentic capacity: cross-cultural validation of the adolescent girls agency scale (AGAS)

Aubryn Sidle, Brenda Oulo, Matt Thomas
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Community Health and Development
article

Measuring agentic capacity: cross-cultural validation of the adolescent girls agency scale (AGAS)

Aubryn Sidle, Brenda Oulo, Matt Thomas
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the development and psychometric validation of the Adolescent Girls Agency scale (AGAS), a novel instrument specifically designed to measure agentic capacity among girls in East and Southern Africa. Addressing a critical gap in evaluation tools, the AGAS provides a structured framework for assessing girls’ agentic capacity across four distinct domains: self-beliefs, gendered environmental beliefs, self-governance skills, and leadership skills. The validation process employed a rigorous mixed-methods design, integrating qualitative cognitive interviews to ensure cultural relevance and clarity with item response theory analyses to assess psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, and to guide iterative scale refinement. Triangulation of statistical evidence on items requiring further review with stakeholder feedback ensured that the instrument reflected the lived experiences of girls in the target region while aligning with programmatic objectives. The resulting final version of the AGAS provides a robust tool for pre–post evaluation of interventions aimed at strengthening girls’ agentic capacity in East Africa. By offering domain-specific insights into how programs influence different dimensions of agency, the AGAS supports targeted program improvements and more informed decision-making. While three of the AGAS’s four domains are hypothesized to be universal, further research is required to establish reliability and validity across diverse settings to support recommendations for adaptation in other comparable global contexts.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Girls Incorporated (US), Cornell University (US), Statistical Research (United States) (US), University of Sheffield (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.