Effects of multidomain interventions on health outcomes in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: With rising global aging, healthcare systems face challenges from multimorbidity, functional decline, and cognitive impairment. Multidomain interventions offer a promising approach to promoting healthy aging. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of multidomain interventions (≥3 domains) on motor-functional, cognitive, and psychological outcomes in older adults without moderate/severe dementia. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Embase were searched up to April 30, 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials or observational studies involving adults ≥60 years receiving multidomain interventions versus control/standard care. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies (57 comparisons) were included (median age: 75.3 intervention, 75.1 control; >60% female). Intervention lasted 2-36 months (median 6.0). All studies targeted the physical domain, 78.9% cognitive, 81.6% nutritional, and 84.2% additional domains. Motor-functional outcomes improved significantly (e.g., Short Physical Performance Battery: SMD = 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.66; Cardiovascular Health Study frailty criteria: SMD = -0.14, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05), with diminishing effects over time. Other indicators (e.g., handgrip strength), showed modest improvements. Cognitive improvements were limited to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; SMD = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.40). Psychological benefits included reduced depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale: SMD = -0.35, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.12). Effect estimates for Timed Up and Go and RBANS were attenuated in sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk-of-bias studies. CONCLUSIONS: Multidomain interventions improve motor-functional and psychological well-being. Moderate cognitive benefits are observed primarily using the MoCA. These findings support large-scale implementation in geriatric care and highlight the need for strategies to sustain long-term effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The journal of nutrition health & aging
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnha.2026.100865
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of multidomain interventions on health outcomes in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gessica Sala, Federico Emanuele Pozzi, Luca Cuffaro, Vittorio Dibello et al.
The journal of nutrition health & aging
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Effects of multidomain interventions on health outcomes in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gessica Sala, Federico Emanuele Pozzi, Luca Cuffaro, Vittorio Dibello, Alessandra Palladini, Alice Margherita Ornago, Alberto Finazzi, Eleonora Pagan, Carlo Custodero, C Okoye, Carlo Ferrarese, Giuseppe Bellelli, Maria Cristina Ferrara, Antonella Zambon, Vincenzo Solfrizzi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With rising global aging, healthcare systems face challenges from multimorbidity, functional decline, and cognitive impairment. Multidomain interventions offer a promising approach to promoting healthy aging. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of multidomain interventions (≥3 domains) on motor-functional, cognitive, and psychological outcomes in older adults without moderate/severe dementia. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Embase were searched up to April 30, 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials or observational studies involving adults ≥60 years receiving multidomain interventions versus control/standard care. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies (57 comparisons) were included (median age: 75.3 intervention, 75.1 control; >60% female). Intervention lasted 2-36 months (median 6.0). All studies targeted the physical domain, 78.9% cognitive, 81.6% nutritional, and 84.2% additional domains. Motor-functional outcomes improved significantly (e.g., Short Physical Performance Battery: SMD = 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.66; Cardiovascular Health Study frailty criteria: SMD = -0.14, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05), with diminishing effects over time. Other indicators (e.g., handgrip strength), showed modest improvements. Cognitive improvements were limited to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; SMD = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.40). Psychological benefits included reduced depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale: SMD = -0.35, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.12). Effect estimates for Timed Up and Go and RBANS were attenuated in sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk-of-bias studies. CONCLUSIONS: Multidomain interventions improve motor-functional and psychological well-being. Moderate cognitive benefits are observed primarily using the MoCA. These findings support large-scale implementation in geriatric care and highlight the need for strategies to sustain long-term effectiveness.

The journal of nutrition health & agingVol. 30(6)
Stockholm University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT), Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden (DE), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.