Safely Stopping Premedications in Patients Receiving Paclitaxel: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Premedications used to prevent paclitaxel-associated infusion hypersensitivity reactions (iHSRs) can cause undesirable toxicities, such as sleep disturbance and weight gain. Although phase II data suggest that discontinuing premedications after paclitaxel-associated iHSRs may be safe and feasible in select patients without prior iHSRs, no prospective randomized trials have evaluated this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy. Those who experienced no iHSRs with the first 2 doses of paclitaxel were randomized to either continue standard premedications (control arm) or to discontinue all premedications (investigational arm). Both arms were followed longitudinally for any subsequent iHSRs requiring parenteral rescue medications. Additionally, changes in weight, drug-related side effects, and quality of life were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were randomized; 89 were evaluable (46 in the control arm and 43 in the investigational arm). Only 1 (2.3%) patient in the investigational arm experienced an iHSR, which resolved with rescue medications. No iHSRs occurred in the control arm. The estimated proportion of subjects who experienced a hypersensitivity reaction (exact binomial 95% CI) was 2.3% (95% CI, 0.1%-12.3%) in the investigational arm and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-7.7%) in the control arm. Patients in the investigational arm reported significantly less sleep disruption (0.5 vs 1.7; P=.002) and unwanted appetite increases (1.0 vs 2.5; P=.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of premedications after 2 uneventful paclitaxel doses was not associated with a high rate of subsequent iHSRs and resulted in fewer steroid-related side effects. This strategy may reduce unnecessary medication exposure, improve patient experience, and streamline clinical workflows. For patients who do not experience iHSRs during the first 2 paclitaxel treatments, discontinuing premedications appears safe and may improve tolerability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7475
Primary Topic
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safely Stopping Premedications in Patients Receiving Paclitaxel: A Randomized Trial

Paul J. Novotny, Daniel S. Childs, Robert Wesolowski, C L Loprinzi et al.
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
article

Safely Stopping Premedications in Patients Receiving Paclitaxel: A Randomized Trial

Paul J. Novotny, Daniel S. Childs, Robert Wesolowski, C L Loprinzi, Ashley Pariser Davenport, M. Lustberg, Jenna Cody, Michael Berger, Nicole Williams, Margaret E. Gatti-Mays
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Premedications used to prevent paclitaxel-associated infusion hypersensitivity reactions (iHSRs) can cause undesirable toxicities, such as sleep disturbance and weight gain. Although phase II data suggest that discontinuing premedications after paclitaxel-associated iHSRs may be safe and feasible in select patients without prior iHSRs, no prospective randomized trials have evaluated this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy. Those who experienced no iHSRs with the first 2 doses of paclitaxel were randomized to either continue standard premedications (control arm) or to discontinue all premedications (investigational arm). Both arms were followed longitudinally for any subsequent iHSRs requiring parenteral rescue medications. Additionally, changes in weight, drug-related side effects, and quality of life were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were randomized; 89 were evaluable (46 in the control arm and 43 in the investigational arm). Only 1 (2.3%) patient in the investigational arm experienced an iHSR, which resolved with rescue medications. No iHSRs occurred in the control arm. The estimated proportion of subjects who experienced a hypersensitivity reaction (exact binomial 95% CI) was 2.3% (95% CI, 0.1%-12.3%) in the investigational arm and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-7.7%) in the control arm. Patients in the investigational arm reported significantly less sleep disruption (0.5 vs 1.7; P=.002) and unwanted appetite increases (1.0 vs 2.5; P=.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of premedications after 2 uneventful paclitaxel doses was not associated with a high rate of subsequent iHSRs and resulted in fewer steroid-related side effects. This strategy may reduce unnecessary medication exposure, improve patient experience, and streamline clinical workflows. For patients who do not experience iHSRs during the first 2 paclitaxel treatments, discontinuing premedications appears safe and may improve tolerability.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Yale Cancer Center (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Ohio State University, Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Denali Therapeutics, Disarm Therapeutics, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, National Institutes of Health, Genentech
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.