1143 Cognitive Outcomes of 12-Month CPAP Therapy in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) prevalence approaches 60% in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The primary aim of this quasi-experimental clinical trial, “Changing the Trajectory of Mild Cognitive Impairment with CPAP Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea”, was to determine the effect of CPAP adherence on cognitive function over 1 year. Methods Study inclusion criteria: Age 55-85, and amnestic MCI based on established testing criteria. Those who chose to try CPAP received a tailored telehealth CPAP adherence intervention and those who chose not to try CPAP received a telehealth attention control intervention. Participants were divided into a CPAP-adherent group (> = 4 hours use per night) or a CPAP-non-adherent group (< 4 hours use per night). The pre-specified primary cognitive outcome was psychomotor/cognitive processing speed as measured by the Digit Symbol Coding (DSC) test. Percent change at 6 and 12 months from baseline were compared. The CPAP adherent and non-adherent groups were compared using propensity score-weighted linear regression analysis. Results At 12 months, 116 (63.0%) were CPAP adherent and 68 (37.0%) were not. Mean age was 67.3 years (sd. 7.5); 55.4% were male; 71.2% were White persons, and 7.1% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Mean AHI was 33.4 (sd. 20.7). At 6 months, the percent change from baseline in psychomotor/cognitive processing speed in the CPAP adherent group was 7.83% greater than the CPAP non-adherent group (95% C.I.: 2.50, 13.16, p=0.004). At 12 months, group differences were not statistically significant. Adherent participants with less cognitive impairment [Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score = 0)] at baseline had a 15.7% improvement in DSC at 6 months relative to the CPAP non-adherent group (p < .05). Adherent participants with a baseline CDR = 0.5 (indicative of greater cognitive impairment) had a 7.75% improvement in psychomotor/cognitive processing speed relative to the CPAP non-adherent group (p < 0.05). Conclusion In older adults with MCI and moderate-severe OSA, the CPAP adherent group, compared to CPAP non-adherent group, had significantly better psychomotor/cognitive processing speed at 6 months, but not at one year. Participants with less severe baseline cognitive impairment demonstrated the largest gains in cognitive performance. Support (if any) R01AG054435

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1142
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1143 Cognitive Outcomes of 12-Month CPAP Therapy in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Alicia Lozano, Nalaka Gooneratne, Luqi Chi, Vani Vallabhaneni et al.
SLEEP
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

1143 Cognitive Outcomes of 12-Month CPAP Therapy in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Alicia Lozano, Nalaka Gooneratne, Luqi Chi, Vani Vallabhaneni, Wenyan Ji, KM Richards, Cynthia Cheng, Jieun Lim, Eric Davis, Hanlon Alexandra, Stephen Moelter, David Wolk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) prevalence approaches 60% in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The primary aim of this quasi-experimental clinical trial, “Changing the Trajectory of Mild Cognitive Impairment with CPAP Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea”, was to determine the effect of CPAP adherence on cognitive function over 1 year. Methods Study inclusion criteria: Age 55-85, and amnestic MCI based on established testing criteria. Those who chose to try CPAP received a tailored telehealth CPAP adherence intervention and those who chose not to try CPAP received a telehealth attention control intervention. Participants were divided into a CPAP-adherent group (> = 4 hours use per night) or a CPAP-non-adherent group (< 4 hours use per night). The pre-specified primary cognitive outcome was psychomotor/cognitive processing speed as measured by the Digit Symbol Coding (DSC) test. Percent change at 6 and 12 months from baseline were compared. The CPAP adherent and non-adherent groups were compared using propensity score-weighted linear regression analysis. Results At 12 months, 116 (63.0%) were CPAP adherent and 68 (37.0%) were not. Mean age was 67.3 years (sd. 7.5); 55.4% were male; 71.2% were White persons, and 7.1% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Mean AHI was 33.4 (sd. 20.7). At 6 months, the percent change from baseline in psychomotor/cognitive processing speed in the CPAP adherent group was 7.83% greater than the CPAP non-adherent group (95% C.I.: 2.50, 13.16, p=0.004). At 12 months, group differences were not statistically significant. Adherent participants with less cognitive impairment [Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score = 0)] at baseline had a 15.7% improvement in DSC at 6 months relative to the CPAP non-adherent group (p < .05). Adherent participants with a baseline CDR = 0.5 (indicative of greater cognitive impairment) had a 7.75% improvement in psychomotor/cognitive processing speed relative to the CPAP non-adherent group (p < 0.05). Conclusion In older adults with MCI and moderate-severe OSA, the CPAP adherent group, compared to CPAP non-adherent group, had significantly better psychomotor/cognitive processing speed at 6 months, but not at one year. Participants with less severe baseline cognitive impairment demonstrated the largest gains in cognitive performance. Support (if any) R01AG054435

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), University of Saint Joseph (US), Sleep Research Society (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Sleep Management Institute (US), Saint Joseph's University (US), University of Virginia (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.