Data procurement and market power in the Dutch public sector: How to become a stronger buyer

Governments around the world are actively exploring how they can tackle societal problems through data-driven decision-making. As much data is now in the hands of the private sector, governments increasingly resort to purchasing data from private sources. There is, however, scant empirical evidence and a lack of understanding of the experiences of governments with this practice. This study therefore asks the following questions: how do governments purchase data from the private sector and what challenges do they encounter in the process? We conducted an exploratory multiple case study based on sixteen interviews with seven governments in the Netherlands focusing on use cases in the mobility or spatial domains. Our analysis covers, among other things, the purpose of the purchases and to what extent alternatives and joint procurement were considered, the purchasing procedures and respective market characteristics, and the governments' assessment and satisfaction with the purchases. We identify a number of challenges that are associated with data procurement. Our conclusions highlight three priorities to strengthen the position of governments as buyers of data: the need to balance competing priorities, the need to understand how dependency and lock-in emerges, and the need to expand assessments to public values. • We investigated how seven Dutch governments procure data from companies. • Governments rely on passive data procurement strategies which poses risks. • We identify three priorities for governments to become stronger buyers of data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Government Information Quarterly
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2026.102145
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data procurement and market power in the Dutch public sector: How to become a stronger buyer

Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Fredo Schotanus, Iryna Susha, Sofie de Wilde de Ligny
Government Information Quarterly
E-Government and Public Services
article

Data procurement and market power in the Dutch public sector: How to become a stronger buyer

Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Fredo Schotanus, Iryna Susha, Sofie de Wilde de Ligny
article en

Abstract

Governments around the world are actively exploring how they can tackle societal problems through data-driven decision-making. As much data is now in the hands of the private sector, governments increasingly resort to purchasing data from private sources. There is, however, scant empirical evidence and a lack of understanding of the experiences of governments with this practice. This study therefore asks the following questions: how do governments purchase data from the private sector and what challenges do they encounter in the process? We conducted an exploratory multiple case study based on sixteen interviews with seven governments in the Netherlands focusing on use cases in the mobility or spatial domains. Our analysis covers, among other things, the purpose of the purchases and to what extent alternatives and joint procurement were considered, the purchasing procedures and respective market characteristics, and the governments' assessment and satisfaction with the purchases. We identify a number of challenges that are associated with data procurement. Our conclusions highlight three priorities to strengthen the position of governments as buyers of data: the need to balance competing priorities, the need to understand how dependency and lock-in emerges, and the need to expand assessments to public values. • We investigated how seven Dutch governments procure data from companies. • Governments rely on passive data procurement strategies which poses risks. • We identify three priorities for governments to become stronger buyers of data.

Government Information QuarterlyVol. 43(2)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.