0326 Dreams as a Dimension of Sleep Health: Expanding the RU-SATED Model

Abstract Introduction The RU-SATED measure (Buysse, 2014) is a 6-item scale assessing sleep health dimensions: Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration. This study aimed to (1) establish convergent and discriminant validity of the RU-SATED with established sleep measures, and (2) evaluate three candidate items to expand the scale to include dream health (RU-SATED-D). Methods Undergraduate participants (N = 501; 67% female, 6% gender diverse; 44% White; M age = 19.35, SD = 2.13) completed the RU-SATED, three candidate dream items, nine established sleep/nightmare measures (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Insomnia Severity Index, Glasgow Sleep Appraisal Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance, Nightmare Distress Index, Disturbing Dreams and Nightmare Severity Index, Nightmare Severity Index), and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) for discriminant validity. Three candidate items assessing dream-related sleep disturbances were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), with each item tested individually alongside the original 6 RU-SATED items, plus convergent validity with nightmare indices and incremental validity analyses. Results RU-SATED items showed strong convergent validity with sleep measures (|r| = 0.11-0.72, p < 0.05) and weaker correlations with AUDIT (r = -0.19 to 0.00), supporting discriminant validity. Single-factor models for each candidate dream item demonstrated acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.036-0.047, TLI = 0.953-0.968), with factor loadings of 0.273-0.503. All items showed strong convergent validity with nightmare measures (r = 0.26-0.45, p < 0.001). The item “I sleep through the night without being awakened by dreams” displayed superior incremental validity across sleep outcomes (ΔR² = 0.012-0.028, p < 0.05). Conclusion RU-SATED demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity with established sleep measures. The expanded RU-SATED-D scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties, supporting dreams as a distinct component of sleep health warranting assessment. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0326
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0326 Dreams as a Dimension of Sleep Health: Expanding the RU-SATED Model

Danica Slavish, Emily Feldman
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0326 Dreams as a Dimension of Sleep Health: Expanding the RU-SATED Model

Danica Slavish, Emily Feldman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The RU-SATED measure (Buysse, 2014) is a 6-item scale assessing sleep health dimensions: Regularity, Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration. This study aimed to (1) establish convergent and discriminant validity of the RU-SATED with established sleep measures, and (2) evaluate three candidate items to expand the scale to include dream health (RU-SATED-D). Methods Undergraduate participants (N = 501; 67% female, 6% gender diverse; 44% White; M age = 19.35, SD = 2.13) completed the RU-SATED, three candidate dream items, nine established sleep/nightmare measures (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Insomnia Severity Index, Glasgow Sleep Appraisal Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance, Nightmare Distress Index, Disturbing Dreams and Nightmare Severity Index, Nightmare Severity Index), and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) for discriminant validity. Three candidate items assessing dream-related sleep disturbances were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), with each item tested individually alongside the original 6 RU-SATED items, plus convergent validity with nightmare indices and incremental validity analyses. Results RU-SATED items showed strong convergent validity with sleep measures (|r| = 0.11-0.72, p < 0.05) and weaker correlations with AUDIT (r = -0.19 to 0.00), supporting discriminant validity. Single-factor models for each candidate dream item demonstrated acceptable fit (RMSEA = 0.036-0.047, TLI = 0.953-0.968), with factor loadings of 0.273-0.503. All items showed strong convergent validity with nightmare measures (r = 0.26-0.45, p < 0.001). The item “I sleep through the night without being awakened by dreams” displayed superior incremental validity across sleep outcomes (ΔR² = 0.012-0.028, p < 0.05). Conclusion RU-SATED demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity with established sleep measures. The expanded RU-SATED-D scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties, supporting dreams as a distinct component of sleep health warranting assessment. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
University of North Texas (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.