Short-term effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on the corrected QT interval: a target trial emulation

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the short-term effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on the corrected QT interval (QTc) by emulating a published randomized controlled trial (RCT) using electronic health record (EHR) data, and to assess whether target trial emulation (TTE) can replicate RCT findings for a pharmacological safety outcome at substantially greater scale. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study emulating a target trial, reported according to the Transparent Reporting of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial (TARGET) guideline. SETTING: Single tertiary A teaching hospital in China, March 2012 to September 2024. PARTICIPANTS: Of 619,216 cardiology hospitalizations, 165,460 new statin users with suspected coronary artery disease met all eligibility criteria. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 98,860 patients (49,430 per group) constituted the analytic cohort. All standardized mean differences were below 0.013 after matching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in Fridericia-corrected QT interval (ΔQTcF) from baseline to first follow-up electrocardiogram (24-72 h). Secondary outcomes included newly emerged QTc prolongation, any QTc increase, clinically significant increase (> 30 ms), severe QTc prolongation, and a composite cardiac safety endpoint. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated. RESULTS: The mean ΔQTcF in the rosuvastatin group was + 7.71 ms (SD 20.41) versus + 0.31 ms (SD 22.30) in the atorvastatin group, yielding a between-group difference of 7.40 ms (95% CI 7.13 to 7.67; P < 0.001). Newly emerged QTc prolongation occurred in 14.7% versus 10.5% (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.45). The composite cardiac safety endpoint did not differ (0.4% versus 0.5%; P = 0.24). Results were consistent across eight subgroups and six sensitivity analyses. The TTE estimate was concordant with the published RCT finding of 7.40 ms (heterogeneity P = 1.00), with a 14-fold narrower confidence interval. The negative control outcome analysis showed no residual bias. CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin was associated with a 7.40 ms greater short-term QTcF prolongation than atorvastatin in a cohort 212 times larger than the emulated RCT, without excess clinical cardiac events over a mean follow-up of 48 h. Target trial emulation successfully replicated the RCT finding for a short-term drug safety outcome, demonstrating the framework's value for pharmacovigilance research using routine clinical data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-026-04076-w
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-term effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on the corrected QT interval: a target trial emulation

Shengdi Lu, Yun Shen, Xinyi Lu, Xia Xia et al.
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Short-term effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on the corrected QT interval: a target trial emulation

Shengdi Lu, Yun Shen, Xinyi Lu, Xia Xia, Wei Wei, Xin Chen, Gang Hu, Xinyue Wu, Yang Liu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the short-term effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on the corrected QT interval (QTc) by emulating a published randomized controlled trial (RCT) using electronic health record (EHR) data, and to assess whether target trial emulation (TTE) can replicate RCT findings for a pharmacological safety outcome at substantially greater scale. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study emulating a target trial, reported according to the Transparent Reporting of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial (TARGET) guideline. SETTING: Single tertiary A teaching hospital in China, March 2012 to September 2024. PARTICIPANTS: Of 619,216 cardiology hospitalizations, 165,460 new statin users with suspected coronary artery disease met all eligibility criteria. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 98,860 patients (49,430 per group) constituted the analytic cohort. All standardized mean differences were below 0.013 after matching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the change in Fridericia-corrected QT interval (ΔQTcF) from baseline to first follow-up electrocardiogram (24-72 h). Secondary outcomes included newly emerged QTc prolongation, any QTc increase, clinically significant increase (> 30 ms), severe QTc prolongation, and a composite cardiac safety endpoint. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects were estimated. RESULTS: The mean ΔQTcF in the rosuvastatin group was + 7.71 ms (SD 20.41) versus + 0.31 ms (SD 22.30) in the atorvastatin group, yielding a between-group difference of 7.40 ms (95% CI 7.13 to 7.67; P < 0.001). Newly emerged QTc prolongation occurred in 14.7% versus 10.5% (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.45). The composite cardiac safety endpoint did not differ (0.4% versus 0.5%; P = 0.24). Results were consistent across eight subgroups and six sensitivity analyses. The TTE estimate was concordant with the published RCT finding of 7.40 ms (heterogeneity P = 1.00), with a 14-fold narrower confidence interval. The negative control outcome analysis showed no residual bias. CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin was associated with a 7.40 ms greater short-term QTcF prolongation than atorvastatin in a cohort 212 times larger than the emulated RCT, without excess clinical cardiac events over a mean follow-up of 48 h. Target trial emulation successfully replicated the RCT finding for a short-term drug safety outcome, demonstrating the framework's value for pharmacovigilance research using routine clinical data.

European Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 82(6)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.