Biomechanical comparison of high hydrostatic pressure versus liquid nitrogen treatment for devitalized bone grafts: a fresh porcine model study

BACKGROUND: Devitalized bone grafting is a widely used reconstructive technique after tumor resection. Conventional devitalization methods, such as autoclaving and irradiation, compromise the biological and mechanical properties of bone. Cryotreatment with liquid nitrogen has been associated with relatively early bone union; however, concerns remain regarding reduced initial mechanical strength and the risk of nonunion. High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) has been proposed as a novel devitalization method that may better preserve bone strength. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of fresh porcine bone treated with HHP versus liquid nitrogen. METHODS: Fresh, unfrozen porcine vertebrae and femurs were collected and processed within 72 h to avoid confounding mechanical effects of prior freezing. Trabecular bone cubes (10 mm per side) from the vertebrae underwent compressive testing (n = 10 per group), and cortical bone beams (5 mm wide) from the femurs underwent three-point bending tests (n = 12 per group). Specimens were allocated to three groups: HHP-treated (200 MPa, 10 min), liquid nitrogen-treated (- 196 °C, 20 min), and untreated control. Mechanical testing was performed using a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test (p < 0.05) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In trabecular bone compression testing, both HHP-treated and liquid nitrogen-treated groups demonstrated lower maximum compressive load at failure than the control group. A significant difference was observed only between the liquid nitrogen-treated and control groups (p = 0.003). The difference between the HHP-treated and control groups was not significant (p = 0.07), and no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups (p = 0.39). In cortical bone three-point bending tests, no significant differences in maximum load at failure were observed among the groups (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: HHP treatment did not significantly compromise mechanical properties compared with the untreated control, whereas liquid nitrogen treatment significantly reduced the maximum compressive load at failure of trabecular bone. These findings suggest that HHP may represent a structurally viable devitalization method for bone grafts, particularly in load-bearing applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09943-2
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical comparison of high hydrostatic pressure versus liquid nitrogen treatment for devitalized bone grafts: a fresh porcine model study

Michiharu Sakamoto, Eiichi Sawaragi, Satoshi Nagatani, Tetsuji Yamaoka et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Biomechanical comparison of high hydrostatic pressure versus liquid nitrogen treatment for devitalized bone grafts: a fresh porcine model study

Michiharu Sakamoto, Eiichi Sawaragi, Satoshi Nagatani, Tetsuji Yamaoka, Satoshi Kato, Rie Akita, Noriaki Yokogawa, Takaki Shimizu, Satoru Demura, Yohei Yamada, Naoki Morimoto, Shinji Miwa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Devitalized bone grafting is a widely used reconstructive technique after tumor resection. Conventional devitalization methods, such as autoclaving and irradiation, compromise the biological and mechanical properties of bone. Cryotreatment with liquid nitrogen has been associated with relatively early bone union; however, concerns remain regarding reduced initial mechanical strength and the risk of nonunion. High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) has been proposed as a novel devitalization method that may better preserve bone strength. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of fresh porcine bone treated with HHP versus liquid nitrogen. METHODS: Fresh, unfrozen porcine vertebrae and femurs were collected and processed within 72 h to avoid confounding mechanical effects of prior freezing. Trabecular bone cubes (10 mm per side) from the vertebrae underwent compressive testing (n = 10 per group), and cortical bone beams (5 mm wide) from the femurs underwent three-point bending tests (n = 12 per group). Specimens were allocated to three groups: HHP-treated (200 MPa, 10 min), liquid nitrogen-treated (- 196 °C, 20 min), and untreated control. Mechanical testing was performed using a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test (p < 0.05) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In trabecular bone compression testing, both HHP-treated and liquid nitrogen-treated groups demonstrated lower maximum compressive load at failure than the control group. A significant difference was observed only between the liquid nitrogen-treated and control groups (p = 0.003). The difference between the HHP-treated and control groups was not significant (p = 0.07), and no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups (p = 0.39). In cortical bone three-point bending tests, no significant differences in maximum load at failure were observed among the groups (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: HHP treatment did not significantly compromise mechanical properties compared with the untreated control, whereas liquid nitrogen treatment significantly reduced the maximum compressive load at failure of trabecular bone. These findings suggest that HHP may represent a structurally viable devitalization method for bone grafts, particularly in load-bearing applications.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Kanazawa University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Komatsu University (JP)
Shibuya Science Culture and Sports Foundation
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.