Data by experience: A survey investigating differences in data citation practices according to researchers’ career stages

Abstract Data citation and reuse are complex practices. While much research has examined the effect of disciplinary norms on data citation and reuse, much less work has examined the impact of career stages. In this paper, we present the results of a survey (n = 2,492) to explicitly investigate data citation practices, preferences, and motivations for indicating data reuse, using a sample of corresponding authors by career stage. We present findings about these researchers’ current practices and motivations for reusing and citing data and also examine their preferences for how they would like their own data to be cited. We find that researchers of various career stages have similar views and behaviors towards data sharing and reuse, with some key differences including the following points: 1) most sharing and reuse patterns with differences increased or decreased consistently along with career progression; 2) early career researchers place more importance on metrics about data created by others while 3) middle career researchers place more importance on metrics for their own data. Additionally, we discuss the unique qualities within each career stage, and present a future outlook on how research on this topic can be carried forward. Peer Review https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/QSS.a.483

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantitative Science Studies
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss.a.483
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data by experience: A survey investigating differences in data citation practices according to researchers’ career stages

Anton Ninkov, Stefanie Haustein, Kathleen Gregory, Constance Poitras et al.
Quantitative Science Studies
Research Data Management Practices
article

Data by experience: A survey investigating differences in data citation practices according to researchers’ career stages

Anton Ninkov, Stefanie Haustein, Kathleen Gregory, Constance Poitras, Chantal Ripp, Isabella Peters
article en

Abstract

Abstract Data citation and reuse are complex practices. While much research has examined the effect of disciplinary norms on data citation and reuse, much less work has examined the impact of career stages. In this paper, we present the results of a survey (n = 2,492) to explicitly investigate data citation practices, preferences, and motivations for indicating data reuse, using a sample of corresponding authors by career stage. We present findings about these researchers’ current practices and motivations for reusing and citing data and also examine their preferences for how they would like their own data to be cited. We find that researchers of various career stages have similar views and behaviors towards data sharing and reuse, with some key differences including the following points: 1) most sharing and reuse patterns with differences increased or decreased consistently along with career progression; 2) early career researchers place more importance on metrics about data created by others while 3) middle career researchers place more importance on metrics for their own data. Additionally, we discuss the unique qualities within each career stage, and present a future outlook on how research on this topic can be carried forward. Peer Review https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/QSS.a.483

Quantitative Science Studies
University of Ottawa (CA), Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Université de Montréal (CA), Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.