Evaluating Chin Position Stability After Genioplasty Using Lateral Cephalometry, CT and 3D Models: a retrospective study

Objective:Stabilization is considered to have an important role in the overall success of genioplasty, as in all orthognathic surgical procedures. Traditional assessments based on two-dimensional lateral cephalograms are limited by their inability to accurately represent complex three-dimensional anatomical changes. With advances in three-dimensional imaging and modeling, more precise evaluations of surgical outcomes have become possible. This study aims to compare the accuracy and consistency of two-dimensional lateral cephalograms, three-dimensional cephalometric analysis, and three-dimensional-printed models in assessing postoperative chin position stability following genioplasty.Methods:In this retrospective study, 12 patients who underwent genioplasty were assessed at three time points: preoperatively, at postoperative week one, and at postoperative month six. Positional changes of multiple anatomical reference points in the horizontal and vertical planes were measured using 2-dimensional lateral cephalograms, maxillofacial computed tomography scans, and 3-dimensional printed models. The accuracy and consistency levels of these methods in assessing skeletal stability were compared.Results:Measurements obtained from 2-dimensional cephalometric radiographs showed statistically significant differences compared to both 3-dimensional cephalometric analyses and 3-dimensional model measurements in horizontal and vertical dimensions (p 0.05), indicating high consistency between the two 3-dimensional methods.Conclusion:In conclusion, since 2-dimensional lateral cephalograms are limited by the drawbacks of 2-dimensional imaging techniques, leading to potential inaccuracies in assessing structures, 3- dimensional cephalometry via computed tomography or 3-dimensional modeling may offer more precise evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EurAsian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.66702/ejoms.1895077
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Chin Position Stability After Genioplasty Using Lateral Cephalometry, CT and 3D Models: a retrospective study

Mehmet Ali Altay, Alper Sindel, Busehan Bilgin, Öznur Özalp et al.
EurAsian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Evaluating Chin Position Stability After Genioplasty Using Lateral Cephalometry, CT and 3D Models: a retrospective study

Mehmet Ali Altay, Alper Sindel, Busehan Bilgin, Öznur Özalp, Eray Ercan
article en

Abstract

Objective:Stabilization is considered to have an important role in the overall success of genioplasty, as in all orthognathic surgical procedures. Traditional assessments based on two-dimensional lateral cephalograms are limited by their inability to accurately represent complex three-dimensional anatomical changes. With advances in three-dimensional imaging and modeling, more precise evaluations of surgical outcomes have become possible. This study aims to compare the accuracy and consistency of two-dimensional lateral cephalograms, three-dimensional cephalometric analysis, and three-dimensional-printed models in assessing postoperative chin position stability following genioplasty.Methods:In this retrospective study, 12 patients who underwent genioplasty were assessed at three time points: preoperatively, at postoperative week one, and at postoperative month six. Positional changes of multiple anatomical reference points in the horizontal and vertical planes were measured using 2-dimensional lateral cephalograms, maxillofacial computed tomography scans, and 3-dimensional printed models. The accuracy and consistency levels of these methods in assessing skeletal stability were compared.Results:Measurements obtained from 2-dimensional cephalometric radiographs showed statistically significant differences compared to both 3-dimensional cephalometric analyses and 3-dimensional model measurements in horizontal and vertical dimensions (p 0.05), indicating high consistency between the two 3-dimensional methods.Conclusion:In conclusion, since 2-dimensional lateral cephalograms are limited by the drawbacks of 2-dimensional imaging techniques, leading to potential inaccuracies in assessing structures, 3- dimensional cephalometry via computed tomography or 3-dimensional modeling may offer more precise evaluations.

EurAsian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 5(2)
Akdeniz University (TR)
Akdeniz Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.