Life Cycle Assessment of HoLEP: Quantifying Environmental Impact and Opportunities for Sustainable Urologic Surgery

Life cycle assessment reveals that HoLEP has a measurable environmental footprint; adoption of fluid management systems developed according to sustainable-by-design principles can significantly reduce its impact. The healthcare sector faces growing pressure to reduce its environmental impact. In urology, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is a standard treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), but its procedure-related environmental impact remains unknown. We aimed to quantify HoLEP’s life cycle environmental impacts, identify major environmental hotspots, and evaluate the impact of a fluid management system developed according to sustainable-by-design principles. We conducted a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of 20 consecutive HoLEP procedures, following ISO 14040/44 standards and the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology. ISO 14040/44 allowed us to structure the study while the 16 PEF indicators ensure comparability with other European medical devices. All perioperative phases (pre-, intra-, and post-operative) were included, encompassing medical devices, consumables, energy use, and waste streams. Environmental impacts were modeled using SimaPro v9.6 with the Ecoinvent database. Primary outcomes were the PEF score and the carbon footprint (CF). Environmental performance was compared between the 10-L fluid collection canisters and the SUPER S.HO.W. fluid management system. Statistical analyses used non-parametric tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. The median PEF score per HoLEP procedure was 5.9 points (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.7–6.1), with a CF of 106 kg CO 2 -eq (IQR: 102–118). The intra-operative HoLEP phase accounted for 49% of the overall environmental impact. Fluid collection canisters were the main contributors among medical devices (48%). Use of the SUPER S.HO.W. system reduced the PEF score by 21% and the CF by 13%. As a single-center study with a limited sample size, generalizability may be restricted. HoLEP generates quantifiable life cycle environmental impacts. Optimizing surgical workflows and implementing innovative solutions—such as the closed-circuit SUPER S.HO.W. system—significantly reduce the environmental impact of endourological procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Urology Open Science
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2026.04.009
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment of HoLEP: Quantifying Environmental Impact and Opportunities for Sustainable Urologic Surgery

Grégoire Robert, V. Estrade, Franck Bladou, É. Alezra et al.
European Urology Open Science
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Life Cycle Assessment of HoLEP: Quantifying Environmental Impact and Opportunities for Sustainable Urologic Surgery

Grégoire Robert, V. Estrade, Franck Bladou, É. Alezra, Peggy Blanc, Mathieu Meune, Clément Klein, Stéphanie Charon, Françoise Tubiana-Dussin, Grégoire Capon, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Véronique Humbert, Gaelle Margue, Karin Lamouroux
article en

Abstract

Life cycle assessment reveals that HoLEP has a measurable environmental footprint; adoption of fluid management systems developed according to sustainable-by-design principles can significantly reduce its impact. The healthcare sector faces growing pressure to reduce its environmental impact. In urology, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is a standard treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), but its procedure-related environmental impact remains unknown. We aimed to quantify HoLEP’s life cycle environmental impacts, identify major environmental hotspots, and evaluate the impact of a fluid management system developed according to sustainable-by-design principles. We conducted a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of 20 consecutive HoLEP procedures, following ISO 14040/44 standards and the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology. ISO 14040/44 allowed us to structure the study while the 16 PEF indicators ensure comparability with other European medical devices. All perioperative phases (pre-, intra-, and post-operative) were included, encompassing medical devices, consumables, energy use, and waste streams. Environmental impacts were modeled using SimaPro v9.6 with the Ecoinvent database. Primary outcomes were the PEF score and the carbon footprint (CF). Environmental performance was compared between the 10-L fluid collection canisters and the SUPER S.HO.W. fluid management system. Statistical analyses used non-parametric tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. The median PEF score per HoLEP procedure was 5.9 points (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.7–6.1), with a CF of 106 kg CO 2 -eq (IQR: 102–118). The intra-operative HoLEP phase accounted for 49% of the overall environmental impact. Fluid collection canisters were the main contributors among medical devices (48%). Use of the SUPER S.HO.W. system reduced the PEF score by 21% and the CF by 13%. As a single-center study with a limited sample size, generalizability may be restricted. HoLEP generates quantifiable life cycle environmental impacts. Optimizing surgical workflows and implementing innovative solutions—such as the closed-circuit SUPER S.HO.W. system—significantly reduce the environmental impact of endourological procedures.

European Urology Open ScienceVol. 88
Université de Bordeaux (FR), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Nano Carbon (Poland) (PL)
Direction de l’hospitalisation et de l’offre de Soins
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.