0125 Sleep Reactivity Predicts Subjective but not Actigraphy-Derived Sleep Disturbances in Trauma-Exposed Adults

Abstract Introduction Sleep reactivity is a vulnerability to sleep disturbance after stress. Research shows sleep reactivity may be more consistently associated with self-reported rather than actigraphy-derived sleep disturbances in healthy and clinical samples. This “sleep-state misperception” is commonly seen in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), yet it is unknown whether sleep reactivity differentially correlates with subjective versus objective sleep in PTSD. The current study investigated the association between sleep reactivity and sleep disturbances assessed via questionnaires, daily diaries, and actigraphy in trauma-exposed individuals. Methods Participants (N= 129) who had experienced a DSM-5 Criterion A trauma in the past two years, but not prior month, and representing the full spectrum of posttraumatic sequelae were studied (65 meeting PTSD criteria, CAPS-5 mean 30.58; 64 sub-threshold, CAPS-5 mean 11.06). In addition to CAPS-5, participants completed the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test (FIRST), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), PSQI-PTSD Addendum (PSQI-PTSD), and 14-days of sleep diaries and actigraphy. Results The FIRST correlated with all self-reported sleep measures: ISI (r= .47, p < .001), PSQI (r= .29, p < .01), PSQI-PTSD (r= .31, p < .001), diary sleep efficiency (SE; r= -.25, p < .01), and sleep onset latency (SOL; r= .21, p < .05) except diary total sleep time (TST; p > .05). The FIRST was not associated with the corresponding actigraphy-derived sleep parameters (ps > .05). Controlling for PTSD severity (CAPS-5), the FIRST still predicted ISI (β= .45, p= .002), PSQI (β= .09, p= .06), PSQI-PTSD (β= .12, p= .06), but not diary SE (β= -.17, p= .12) or diary SOL (β= .40, p= .16). Conclusion Sleep reactivity was consistently associated with subjective, but not objective, sleep disturbances, suggesting that self-reported sleep reactivity may manifest primarily in perceived sleep difficulties. Alternatively, sleep reactivity may only be associated with actigraphy on nights after participants experience stressors. The FIRST predicted subjective sleep complaints above and beyond PTSD severity, underscoring its value as an index of sleep vulnerability that is distinct from PTSD-related hyperarousal. Findings highlight the importance of assessing both subjective and objective sleep outcomes, as each may capture distinct processes contributing to stress-related sleep problems. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0125
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0125 Sleep Reactivity Predicts Subjective but not Actigraphy-Derived Sleep Disturbances in Trauma-Exposed Adults

Christopher Drake, Christopher Mcgrory, Edward Pace-Schott, Anthony Reffi
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0125 Sleep Reactivity Predicts Subjective but not Actigraphy-Derived Sleep Disturbances in Trauma-Exposed Adults

Christopher Drake, Christopher Mcgrory, Edward Pace-Schott, Anthony Reffi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sleep reactivity is a vulnerability to sleep disturbance after stress. Research shows sleep reactivity may be more consistently associated with self-reported rather than actigraphy-derived sleep disturbances in healthy and clinical samples. This “sleep-state misperception” is commonly seen in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), yet it is unknown whether sleep reactivity differentially correlates with subjective versus objective sleep in PTSD. The current study investigated the association between sleep reactivity and sleep disturbances assessed via questionnaires, daily diaries, and actigraphy in trauma-exposed individuals. Methods Participants (N= 129) who had experienced a DSM-5 Criterion A trauma in the past two years, but not prior month, and representing the full spectrum of posttraumatic sequelae were studied (65 meeting PTSD criteria, CAPS-5 mean 30.58; 64 sub-threshold, CAPS-5 mean 11.06). In addition to CAPS-5, participants completed the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test (FIRST), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), PSQI-PTSD Addendum (PSQI-PTSD), and 14-days of sleep diaries and actigraphy. Results The FIRST correlated with all self-reported sleep measures: ISI (r= .47, p < .001), PSQI (r= .29, p < .01), PSQI-PTSD (r= .31, p < .001), diary sleep efficiency (SE; r= -.25, p < .01), and sleep onset latency (SOL; r= .21, p < .05) except diary total sleep time (TST; p > .05). The FIRST was not associated with the corresponding actigraphy-derived sleep parameters (ps > .05). Controlling for PTSD severity (CAPS-5), the FIRST still predicted ISI (β= .45, p= .002), PSQI (β= .09, p= .06), PSQI-PTSD (β= .12, p= .06), but not diary SE (β= -.17, p= .12) or diary SOL (β= .40, p= .16). Conclusion Sleep reactivity was consistently associated with subjective, but not objective, sleep disturbances, suggesting that self-reported sleep reactivity may manifest primarily in perceived sleep difficulties. Alternatively, sleep reactivity may only be associated with actigraphy on nights after participants experience stressors. The FIRST predicted subjective sleep complaints above and beyond PTSD severity, underscoring its value as an index of sleep vulnerability that is distinct from PTSD-related hyperarousal. Findings highlight the importance of assessing both subjective and objective sleep outcomes, as each may capture distinct processes contributing to stress-related sleep problems. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Henry Ford Health System (US), Suffolk University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.