Bayesian‐Belief Direct Policy Search for Adaptive Water Supply Planning With Endogenous Learning

Abstract Climate change uncertainty challenges water supply planning, where long‐lived infrastructure must ensure reliable supply under evolving conditions. Adaptive planning addresses this by incrementally expanding infrastructure only as needed, reducing unnecessary investments. Direct Policy Search (DPS), a reinforcement learning approach, has been widely used to identify adaptive rules that specify when and how much to expand infrastructure based on system conditions. However, standard DPS assumes static climate uncertainty, overlooking the potential to update uncertainty as new information emerges, potentially leading to over‐ or under‐investment as the climate evolves. We introduce Bayesian‐Belief DPS, a novel framework that integrates Bayesian learning into DPS to account for learning about climate uncertainty in adaptive planning. We do this by expanding the DPS state space to include a belief state, representing evolving climate uncertainty. The belief state is updated using Gaussian process regression as new observations become available. For instance, uncertainty about end‐of‐century climate is greatest early on but declines over time as data accumulates. We apply Bayesian‐Belief DPS to a case study in Mombasa, Kenya, where decision rules optimize infrastructure development over a 100‐year horizon. We compare policy performance across diverse climate and infrastructure scenarios to assess when learning improves planning. Results suggest Bayesian‐Belief DPS enhances robustness and cost‐effectiveness, especially under nonlinear climates, where past trends do not linearly predict future change, and for long‐lived investments, where incorrect assumptions about future climate can lead to high regret. By endogenously modeling climate beliefs, Bayesian‐Belief DPS offers a scalable, generalizable framework for adaptive planning under deep uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr041645
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian‐Belief Direct Policy Search for Adaptive Water Supply Planning With Endogenous Learning

Marta Zaniolo, Sarah Fletcher, Arjun Nellikkattil, Megan Lickley et al.
Water Resources Research
Water resources management and optimization
article

Bayesian‐Belief Direct Policy Search for Adaptive Water Supply Planning With Endogenous Learning

Marta Zaniolo, Sarah Fletcher, Arjun Nellikkattil, Megan Lickley, Mofan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Climate change uncertainty challenges water supply planning, where long‐lived infrastructure must ensure reliable supply under evolving conditions. Adaptive planning addresses this by incrementally expanding infrastructure only as needed, reducing unnecessary investments. Direct Policy Search (DPS), a reinforcement learning approach, has been widely used to identify adaptive rules that specify when and how much to expand infrastructure based on system conditions. However, standard DPS assumes static climate uncertainty, overlooking the potential to update uncertainty as new information emerges, potentially leading to over‐ or under‐investment as the climate evolves. We introduce Bayesian‐Belief DPS, a novel framework that integrates Bayesian learning into DPS to account for learning about climate uncertainty in adaptive planning. We do this by expanding the DPS state space to include a belief state, representing evolving climate uncertainty. The belief state is updated using Gaussian process regression as new observations become available. For instance, uncertainty about end‐of‐century climate is greatest early on but declines over time as data accumulates. We apply Bayesian‐Belief DPS to a case study in Mombasa, Kenya, where decision rules optimize infrastructure development over a 100‐year horizon. We compare policy performance across diverse climate and infrastructure scenarios to assess when learning improves planning. Results suggest Bayesian‐Belief DPS enhances robustness and cost‐effectiveness, especially under nonlinear climates, where past trends do not linearly predict future change, and for long‐lived investments, where incorrect assumptions about future climate can lead to high regret. By endogenously modeling climate beliefs, Bayesian‐Belief DPS offers a scalable, generalizable framework for adaptive planning under deep uncertainty.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 62(5)
Duke University (US), Walsh University (US), Georgetown University (US), Palo Alto Institute (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.