1278 Associations Between Self-Reported Daily Lifestyle Behaviors and Objective Sleep Parameters in a Large, Real-World Sample

Abstract Introduction Lifestyle behaviors may influence sleep architecture and quality. The extent to which sleep parameters are impacted by day-to-day behavioral variations remains poorly understood in large, real-world populations. Methods Sleep was monitored from 11/15/2023-11/14/2025 using a commercially available under-mattress device (Sleeptracker-AI Monitor, Fullpower Technologies Inc., California, USA) that continuously records sleep via piezo-electric sensors. Sleep metrics included wake after sleep onset (WASO), total sleep time (TST), REM and deep sleep percentages, breathing anomaly index (BAI), and arousal index (AI). Each morning, participants self-reported exercise, alcohol consumption, eating, sleep-aid use, and TV or mobile device use. For each question, only participants who provided at least two distinct responses across multiple nights were included to enable within-participant comparisons. Mixed linear models with participant as a random effect were used to derive percentage changes in sleep parameters associated with self-reported behaviors. Results Analyses varied in sample size (largest [exercise]: 85,706 participants, 2,318,639 nights; smallest [sleep-aid use]: 2,440 participants, 88,966 nights; mean across all analyses: 37,304.4 participants, 997,703.6 nights). Across all participants (48.2% female), the mean age was 52.9±14.4 years. All reported effects were significant (p< 0.001). On nights following exercise (vs. no exercise), participants had reduced WASO (some: -1.60%; vigorous: -1.63%), reduced BAI (some: -0.99%; vigorous: -2.44%), increased deep sleep percentage (some: +0.50%; vigorous: +0.63%), and reduced REM sleep percentage with vigorous exercise only (-0.67%). Alcohol use (vs. non-use) was associated with increased WASO (+3.97%), reduced REM sleep percentage (-1.71%), increased deep sleep percentage (+1.38%), reduced BAI (-2.51%), and reduced AI (-1.26%). Eating within 2 hours of bedtime (vs. not eating) increased deep sleep percentage (snack: +0.50%; meal: +1.45%), reduced BAI (snack: -1.07%; meal: -1.01%) and TST (snack: -0.51%; meal: -0.46%), and had opposing effects on WASO (snack: -0.83%; meal: +0.72%). Compared to non-use, sleep-aid use reduced WASO (-4.01%), reduced REM sleep percentage (-1.33%), and increased TST (+2.67%). TV or mobile device use (vs. non-use) was associated with decreased WASO (-1.68%) and TST (-1.10%). Conclusion Lifestyle behaviors were associated with within-person differences in objective sleep metrics. Non-invasive sleep-tracking technologies offer a powerful way to characterize how lifestyle choices influence sleep health. Support (if any) Fullpower Technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1277
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1278 Associations Between Self-Reported Daily Lifestyle Behaviors and Objective Sleep Parameters in a Large, Real-World Sample

Venkat Easwar, Arthur Kinsolving, Susan Baron, Philippe Kahn et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

1278 Associations Between Self-Reported Daily Lifestyle Behaviors and Objective Sleep Parameters in a Large, Real-World Sample

Venkat Easwar, Arthur Kinsolving, Susan Baron, Philippe Kahn, H Yang, Sasha Milton, Jenny Zitser, Ayse Kamaci, Laura Fava, Clete Kushida, Andrew Cotton-Clay, Yue Leng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Lifestyle behaviors may influence sleep architecture and quality. The extent to which sleep parameters are impacted by day-to-day behavioral variations remains poorly understood in large, real-world populations. Methods Sleep was monitored from 11/15/2023-11/14/2025 using a commercially available under-mattress device (Sleeptracker-AI Monitor, Fullpower Technologies Inc., California, USA) that continuously records sleep via piezo-electric sensors. Sleep metrics included wake after sleep onset (WASO), total sleep time (TST), REM and deep sleep percentages, breathing anomaly index (BAI), and arousal index (AI). Each morning, participants self-reported exercise, alcohol consumption, eating, sleep-aid use, and TV or mobile device use. For each question, only participants who provided at least two distinct responses across multiple nights were included to enable within-participant comparisons. Mixed linear models with participant as a random effect were used to derive percentage changes in sleep parameters associated with self-reported behaviors. Results Analyses varied in sample size (largest [exercise]: 85,706 participants, 2,318,639 nights; smallest [sleep-aid use]: 2,440 participants, 88,966 nights; mean across all analyses: 37,304.4 participants, 997,703.6 nights). Across all participants (48.2% female), the mean age was 52.9±14.4 years. All reported effects were significant (p< 0.001). On nights following exercise (vs. no exercise), participants had reduced WASO (some: -1.60%; vigorous: -1.63%), reduced BAI (some: -0.99%; vigorous: -2.44%), increased deep sleep percentage (some: +0.50%; vigorous: +0.63%), and reduced REM sleep percentage with vigorous exercise only (-0.67%). Alcohol use (vs. non-use) was associated with increased WASO (+3.97%), reduced REM sleep percentage (-1.71%), increased deep sleep percentage (+1.38%), reduced BAI (-2.51%), and reduced AI (-1.26%). Eating within 2 hours of bedtime (vs. not eating) increased deep sleep percentage (snack: +0.50%; meal: +1.45%), reduced BAI (snack: -1.07%; meal: -1.01%) and TST (snack: -0.51%; meal: -0.46%), and had opposing effects on WASO (snack: -0.83%; meal: +0.72%). Compared to non-use, sleep-aid use reduced WASO (-4.01%), reduced REM sleep percentage (-1.33%), and increased TST (+2.67%). TV or mobile device use (vs. non-use) was associated with decreased WASO (-1.68%) and TST (-1.10%). Conclusion Lifestyle behaviors were associated with within-person differences in objective sleep metrics. Non-invasive sleep-tracking technologies offer a powerful way to characterize how lifestyle choices influence sleep health. Support (if any) Fullpower Technologies.

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.