Learning events and sequences: What do learners do in collaborative datadriven learning?

Abstract While frameworks like Illustration-Interaction-Intervention-Induction often guide data-driven learning (DDL), few studies examine whether they reflect actual learner behaviour or a prescriptive ideal. This paper analysed field recordings and worksheets from 61 participants using grounded theory, identifying ‘learning events’ (i.e., what learners do) and ‘learning sequences’ (i.e., when and why they do so), grounded in constructivism, sociocultural theory, and the Noticing Hypothesis. These macro- and micro-level insights reveal DDL as a non-linear, iterative process shaped by data observation, repeated rule extraction and testing. The findings inform DDL studies by highlighting the importance of considering non-linearity in task design and providing regular scaffolding. Beyond DDL, the paper contributes to a broader understanding of collaborative, inductive learning and offers implications for task design across educational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ITL Review of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.25011.loo
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning events and sequences: What do learners do in collaborative datadriven learning?

Jarvis Looi
ITL Review of Applied Linguistics
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Learning events and sequences: What do learners do in collaborative datadriven learning?

Jarvis Looi
article en

Abstract

Abstract While frameworks like Illustration-Interaction-Intervention-Induction often guide data-driven learning (DDL), few studies examine whether they reflect actual learner behaviour or a prescriptive ideal. This paper analysed field recordings and worksheets from 61 participants using grounded theory, identifying ‘learning events’ (i.e., what learners do) and ‘learning sequences’ (i.e., when and why they do so), grounded in constructivism, sociocultural theory, and the Noticing Hypothesis. These macro- and micro-level insights reveal DDL as a non-linear, iterative process shaped by data observation, repeated rule extraction and testing. The findings inform DDL studies by highlighting the importance of considering non-linearity in task design and providing regular scaffolding. Beyond DDL, the paper contributes to a broader understanding of collaborative, inductive learning and offers implications for task design across educational contexts.

ITL Review of Applied Linguistics
Université de Lorraine (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.