Endobronchial Hamartoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 17 Cases and Systematic Review of the Contemporary Literature

Background: Endobronchial hamartoma (EBH) is an exceptionally rare benign neoplasm frequently misdiagnosed as an obstructive malignancy. The therapeutic paradigm is shifting from traditional anatomical resection toward parenchyma-preserving interventional techniques. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety profiles of contemporary bronchoscopic interventions versus surgical management for EBH. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a clinical cohort of 17 patients treated between 2013 and 2026, alongside a comprehensive systematic review of 31 contemporary studies (2013–2025). The primary endpoint was the treatment success rate at 3 months, while secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, re-intervention rates, and successful lung parenchyma preservation. Results: Within the analyzed cohort (median age, 58 years), lesions exhibited a significant right-sided predilection (70.6%). Preoperative imaging uniformly revealed non-specific masses, with 41.2% displaying secondary obstructive manifestations. Definitive interventions comprised bronchoscopic management (n = 11, 64.7%) and surgical resection (n = 6, 35.3%). The technical success rate was 100%, with zero major perioperative complications and only minimal-to-scant intraoperative bleeding reported. Over a median follow-up of 3 months, local recurrence was observed in three cases (17.6%)—notably spanning both surgical (n = 2) and bronchoscopic (n = 1) modalities. The systematic review corroborated these findings, underscoring the exemplary safety profile and superior lung-sparing capacity of bronchoscopic interventions. Conclusions: Within the limits of this retrospective cohort and literature review, interventional bronchoscopy appears to be a safe and lung-sparing approach. It may be considered as a preferable initial treatment option for anatomically suitable EBHs. Traditional surgical resection remains necessary for anatomically complex lesions or cases with irreversible distal parenchymal destruction. Vigilant longitudinal surveillance is advised across all modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103616
Primary Topic
Tracheal and airway disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endobronchial Hamartoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 17 Cases and Systematic Review of the Contemporary Literature

Qianqian Hua, Y P Guo, Wei Chen, Xiaoyan Chen
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Tracheal and airway disorders
article

Endobronchial Hamartoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 17 Cases and Systematic Review of the Contemporary Literature

Qianqian Hua, Y P Guo, Wei Chen, Xiaoyan Chen
article en

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial hamartoma (EBH) is an exceptionally rare benign neoplasm frequently misdiagnosed as an obstructive malignancy. The therapeutic paradigm is shifting from traditional anatomical resection toward parenchyma-preserving interventional techniques. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety profiles of contemporary bronchoscopic interventions versus surgical management for EBH. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a clinical cohort of 17 patients treated between 2013 and 2026, alongside a comprehensive systematic review of 31 contemporary studies (2013–2025). The primary endpoint was the treatment success rate at 3 months, while secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, re-intervention rates, and successful lung parenchyma preservation. Results: Within the analyzed cohort (median age, 58 years), lesions exhibited a significant right-sided predilection (70.6%). Preoperative imaging uniformly revealed non-specific masses, with 41.2% displaying secondary obstructive manifestations. Definitive interventions comprised bronchoscopic management (n = 11, 64.7%) and surgical resection (n = 6, 35.3%). The technical success rate was 100%, with zero major perioperative complications and only minimal-to-scant intraoperative bleeding reported. Over a median follow-up of 3 months, local recurrence was observed in three cases (17.6%)—notably spanning both surgical (n = 2) and bronchoscopic (n = 1) modalities. The systematic review corroborated these findings, underscoring the exemplary safety profile and superior lung-sparing capacity of bronchoscopic interventions. Conclusions: Within the limits of this retrospective cohort and literature review, interventional bronchoscopy appears to be a safe and lung-sparing approach. It may be considered as a preferable initial treatment option for anatomically suitable EBHs. Traditional surgical resection remains necessary for anatomically complex lesions or cases with irreversible distal parenchymal destruction. Vigilant longitudinal surveillance is advised across all modalities.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(10)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Tracheal and airway disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.