Can Thai students thrive in CLIL classrooms?

Abstract This study examines how 25 Thai lower secondary students with limited English proficiency engaged with their first experience of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in a logistics-focused lesson. Using video-recorded lessons and classroom observations, the study explores students’ comprehension, participation, and communication across eight sessions. The findings show that students successfully completed visually supported and procedural tasks but struggled with language-intensive activities requiring explanation, classification, or justification. Students frequently relied on Thai and translation tools to manage these challenges, indicating a clear gap between their understanding of the content and the academic English needed for disciplinary communication. The study highlights the importance of gradual task sequencing, explicit language scaffolding, and purposeful L1 integration to support early-stage CLIL implementation. Implications are offered for designing realistic, language-aware CLIL instruction that aligns with the needs of low-proficiency students in the Thai context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24040.kew
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Thai students thrive in CLIL classrooms?

Nattharmma Namfah, Punwalai Kewara
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

Can Thai students thrive in CLIL classrooms?

Nattharmma Namfah, Punwalai Kewara
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how 25 Thai lower secondary students with limited English proficiency engaged with their first experience of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in a logistics-focused lesson. Using video-recorded lessons and classroom observations, the study explores students’ comprehension, participation, and communication across eight sessions. The findings show that students successfully completed visually supported and procedural tasks but struggled with language-intensive activities requiring explanation, classification, or justification. Students frequently relied on Thai and translation tools to manage these challenges, indicating a clear gap between their understanding of the content and the academic English needed for disciplinary communication. The study highlights the importance of gradual task sequencing, explicit language scaffolding, and purposeful L1 integration to support early-stage CLIL implementation. Implications are offered for designing realistic, language-aware CLIL instruction that aligns with the needs of low-proficiency students in the Thai context.

Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Burapha University (TH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.