Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Fluticasone-Umeclidinium-Vilanterol and Beclomethasone-Glycopyrronium-Formoterol Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies for COPD: Real-World Observational Study

Purpose: Multiple guidelines recommend single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) for some patients with COPD. The first two SITTs approved for COPD were beclomethasone-glycopyrronium-formoterol (BEGF, twice daily) and fluticasone-umeclidinium-vilanterol (FUV, once daily). No study has compared the effectiveness and safety of these SITTs on major outcomes. Patients and Methods: We identified a cohort of patients with COPD, 40 years of age or older, from the United Kingdom’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The patients who initiated treatment with FUV or BEGF were compared on the incidence of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, and of pneumonia, over one year, after balancing baseline characteristics by propensity score weighting. Results: The study cohort included 34,825 initiators of FUV and 39,288 initiators of BEGF, well balanced after weighing. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of a first moderate or severe exacerbation with FUV compared with BEGF was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89– 0.93), while for severe exacerbation it was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86– 0.97), corresponding to 27.9 fewer subjects with a moderate or severe exacerbation and 1.0 fewer with a severe exacerbation per 100 treated with FUV for one year. The HR of pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, comparing FUV with BEGF, was 1.06 (95% CI 0.99– 1.13), over all patients. It was 1.14 (95% CI 1.06– 1.24) among those classified as GOLD Group E, and 1.10 (95% CI 1.02– 1.19) among those with a blood eosinophil count ≤ 300 cells/μL, corresponding to increases of 1.7 and 1.0 more subjects with a severe pneumonia per 100 treated with FUV for one year, respectively. Conclusion: In a real-world clinical practice setting of COPD treatment, initiating triple therapy with FUV was associated with a lower incidence of moderate and severe exacerbations than with BEGF. On the other hand, the incidence of a severe pneumonia requiring hospitalisation was higher with FUV among GOLD Group E subjects or those whose blood eosinophil count is not elevated. Keywords: cohort studies, COPD exacerbations, new-user design, observational study, pneumonia

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of COPD
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s585037
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Fluticasone-Umeclidinium-Vilanterol and Beclomethasone-Glycopyrronium-Formoterol Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies for COPD: Real-World Observational Study

Mathew Cherian, Samy Suissa, Sophie Dell'Aniello
International Journal of COPD
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Fluticasone-Umeclidinium-Vilanterol and Beclomethasone-Glycopyrronium-Formoterol Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies for COPD: Real-World Observational Study

Mathew Cherian, Samy Suissa, Sophie Dell'Aniello
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple guidelines recommend single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) for some patients with COPD. The first two SITTs approved for COPD were beclomethasone-glycopyrronium-formoterol (BEGF, twice daily) and fluticasone-umeclidinium-vilanterol (FUV, once daily). No study has compared the effectiveness and safety of these SITTs on major outcomes. Patients and Methods: We identified a cohort of patients with COPD, 40 years of age or older, from the United Kingdom’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The patients who initiated treatment with FUV or BEGF were compared on the incidence of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, and of pneumonia, over one year, after balancing baseline characteristics by propensity score weighting. Results: The study cohort included 34,825 initiators of FUV and 39,288 initiators of BEGF, well balanced after weighing. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of a first moderate or severe exacerbation with FUV compared with BEGF was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89– 0.93), while for severe exacerbation it was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86– 0.97), corresponding to 27.9 fewer subjects with a moderate or severe exacerbation and 1.0 fewer with a severe exacerbation per 100 treated with FUV for one year. The HR of pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, comparing FUV with BEGF, was 1.06 (95% CI 0.99– 1.13), over all patients. It was 1.14 (95% CI 1.06– 1.24) among those classified as GOLD Group E, and 1.10 (95% CI 1.02– 1.19) among those with a blood eosinophil count ≤ 300 cells/μL, corresponding to increases of 1.7 and 1.0 more subjects with a severe pneumonia per 100 treated with FUV for one year, respectively. Conclusion: In a real-world clinical practice setting of COPD treatment, initiating triple therapy with FUV was associated with a lower incidence of moderate and severe exacerbations than with BEGF. On the other hand, the incidence of a severe pneumonia requiring hospitalisation was higher with FUV among GOLD Group E subjects or those whose blood eosinophil count is not elevated. Keywords: cohort studies, COPD exacerbations, new-user design, observational study, pneumonia

International Journal of COPDVol. Volume 21
Jewish General Hospital (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.