0899 Early Childhood Sleep Resources Vary by Caregiver Shift Work: Perceptions of Enhanced Usual Care Families in an RCT

Abstract Introduction Little is known about sleep problem resolution and resources sought among families receiving usual care in outpatient pediatrics. This mixed methods study examined caregiver-perceived child sleep problems and experiences seeking sleep care in families randomized to “enhanced usual care” (EUC; provision of a sleep education handout) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a behavioral sleep intervention. We also examined whether perceptions varied by caregiver shift work, which can impact child sleep. Methods Of the 97 caregiver-child dyads in the RCT, 47 were randomized to EUC (caregivers: 98% mothers, 75% Black, 36% shift-working, 36% living <=125% of poverty line; mean child age=2.6 years, 53% girls). Of the 47 randomized to EUC, 36 completed the follow-up (~15 weeks post-baseline), which included caregiver-reported child sleep problems (5-point Brief Child Sleep Questionnaire item dichotomized as no/a very small problem vs a small to severe problem) and a semi-structured interview regarding perceptions about the EUC sleep education handout and any other sleep resources sought. Integrated thematic analysis was used for qualitative coding (kappa=0.84), with a joint display analysis used to stratify and compare themes for shift-working and non-shift working caregivers. Results Shift workers were more likely to report a child sleep problem at follow-up (89%) than non-shift workers (44%), X2=4.90, p=.027. Qualitatively, some non-shift-working caregivers noted that the EUC sleep education handout was beneficial for addressing child sleep. In contrast, shift workers described the handout as being unhelpful, stating that they had already tried the strategies listed. Shift workers also reported making extra pediatrician or specialist appointments or seeking other interventions to address sleep, noting limited guidance overall. Non-shift-working caregivers did not reference these resources and described doing their own online research for support. Conclusion Shift workers were less likely than non-shift workers to report early childhood sleep problem resolution at 15 weeks after assignment to enhanced usual care in an RCT. Shift workers also described the sleep education handout provided as unhelpful, and, unlike non-shift-working caregivers, described being unable to find helpful external sleep resources. Future research on tailoring early childhood sleep resources for shift-working families is needed. Support (if any) NICHD K23HD094905 (PI: Williamson)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0898
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0899 Early Childhood Sleep Resources Vary by Caregiver Shift Work: Perceptions of Enhanced Usual Care Families in an RCT

Chimereodo Okoroji, Thomas Power, Olivia Elliott, Rachel Honore et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0899 Early Childhood Sleep Resources Vary by Caregiver Shift Work: Perceptions of Enhanced Usual Care Families in an RCT

Chimereodo Okoroji, Thomas Power, Olivia Elliott, Rachel Honore, Diandra Leon, Megha Neelapu, Kristina Boling-Smith, Alexander Fiks, L'Vonne McMillan, Ariel Williamson, Bethany Harvey, Brizhay Davis, Jodi Mindell, Katherine Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Little is known about sleep problem resolution and resources sought among families receiving usual care in outpatient pediatrics. This mixed methods study examined caregiver-perceived child sleep problems and experiences seeking sleep care in families randomized to “enhanced usual care” (EUC; provision of a sleep education handout) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a behavioral sleep intervention. We also examined whether perceptions varied by caregiver shift work, which can impact child sleep. Methods Of the 97 caregiver-child dyads in the RCT, 47 were randomized to EUC (caregivers: 98% mothers, 75% Black, 36% shift-working, 36% living <=125% of poverty line; mean child age=2.6 years, 53% girls). Of the 47 randomized to EUC, 36 completed the follow-up (~15 weeks post-baseline), which included caregiver-reported child sleep problems (5-point Brief Child Sleep Questionnaire item dichotomized as no/a very small problem vs a small to severe problem) and a semi-structured interview regarding perceptions about the EUC sleep education handout and any other sleep resources sought. Integrated thematic analysis was used for qualitative coding (kappa=0.84), with a joint display analysis used to stratify and compare themes for shift-working and non-shift working caregivers. Results Shift workers were more likely to report a child sleep problem at follow-up (89%) than non-shift workers (44%), X2=4.90, p=.027. Qualitatively, some non-shift-working caregivers noted that the EUC sleep education handout was beneficial for addressing child sleep. In contrast, shift workers described the handout as being unhelpful, stating that they had already tried the strategies listed. Shift workers also reported making extra pediatrician or specialist appointments or seeking other interventions to address sleep, noting limited guidance overall. Non-shift-working caregivers did not reference these resources and described doing their own online research for support. Conclusion Shift workers were less likely than non-shift workers to report early childhood sleep problem resolution at 15 weeks after assignment to enhanced usual care in an RCT. Shift workers also described the sleep education handout provided as unhelpful, and, unlike non-shift-working caregivers, described being unable to find helpful external sleep resources. Future research on tailoring early childhood sleep resources for shift-working families is needed. Support (if any) NICHD K23HD094905 (PI: Williamson)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), University of Oregon (US), University of Chicago (US), Saint Joseph's University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.